Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

被引:0
|
作者
Robert Gunzburg
Marek Szpalski
Stuart A. Callary
Christopher J. Colloca
Victor Kosmopoulos
Deed Harrison
Robert J. Moore
机构
[1] Eeuwfeestkliniek Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] Hôpitaux Iris Sud/IRIS South Teaching Hospitals,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma
[4] Arizona State University,Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology
[5] University of North Texas Health Science Center,Bone and Joint Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[6] John Peter Smith Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[7] CBP Non-Profit,undefined
[8] Inc.,undefined
[9] Private Practice,undefined
[10] The Adelaide Center for Spinal Research,undefined
[11] Spine Surgery,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Interspinous implant; Biomechanics; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spine; Kinematics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1–L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571–576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1–L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb’s method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion
    Gunzburg, Robert
    Szpalski, Marek
    Callary, Stuart A.
    Colloca, Christopher J.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Harrison, Deed
    Moore, Robert J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (05) : 696 - 703
  • [2] Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions
    Hartmann, Frank
    Dietz, Sven-Oliver
    Hely, Hans
    Rommens, Pol Maria
    Gercek, Erol
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (07) : 917 - 926
  • [3] Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions
    Frank Hartmann
    Sven-Oliver Dietz
    Hans Hely
    Pol Maria Rommens
    Erol Gercek
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131 : 917 - 926
  • [4] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Arup Kumar Bhadra
    A. S. Raman
    S. Tucker
    H. H. Noordeen
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2008, 18 : 489 - 493
  • [5] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Bhadra, Arup Kumar
    Raman, A. S.
    Tucker, S.
    Noordeen, H. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 18 (07): : 489 - 493
  • [6] Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine
    Rohlmann, A
    Zander, T
    Burra, NK
    Bergmann, G
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2005, 50 (10): : 343 - 347
  • [7] Surgical Treatment of Lateral Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Percutaneous Interspinous Implant
    Mruzek, M.
    Palecek, T.
    Lipina, R.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2015, 78 (02) : 167 - 171
  • [8] Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    刘刚
    赵建宁
    Akira Dezawa
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2008, (06)
  • [9] Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis
    Postacchini, Roberto
    Ferrari, Emiliano
    Cinotti, Gianluca
    Menchetti, Pier Paolo Maria
    Postacchini, Franco
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (10): : 933 - 939
  • [10] Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Liu Gang
    Zhao Jian-ning
    Dezawa, Akira
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 11 (06) : 364 - 367