Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

被引:0
|
作者
Robert Gunzburg
Marek Szpalski
Stuart A. Callary
Christopher J. Colloca
Victor Kosmopoulos
Deed Harrison
Robert J. Moore
机构
[1] Eeuwfeestkliniek Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] Hôpitaux Iris Sud/IRIS South Teaching Hospitals,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma
[4] Arizona State University,Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology
[5] University of North Texas Health Science Center,Bone and Joint Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[6] John Peter Smith Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[7] CBP Non-Profit,undefined
[8] Inc.,undefined
[9] Private Practice,undefined
[10] The Adelaide Center for Spinal Research,undefined
[11] Spine Surgery,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Interspinous implant; Biomechanics; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spine; Kinematics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1–L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571–576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1–L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb’s method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication
    Richards, JC
    Majumdar, S
    Lindsey, DP
    Beaupré, GS
    Yerby, SA
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (07) : 744 - 749
  • [32] Device related complications of the Coflex interspinous process implant for the lumbar spine
    Zang Lei
    Du Peng
    Hai Yong
    Su Qing-jun
    Lu Shi-bao
    Liu Tie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (13) : 2517 - 2522
  • [33] Percutaneous Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with a New Interspinous Device
    Masala, Salvatore
    Fiori, Roberto
    Bartolucci, Dario Alberto
    Volpi, Tommaso
    Calabria, Eros
    Novegno, Federica
    Simonetti, Giovanni
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02) : 368 - 374
  • [34] Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with aperius perclid interspinous system
    M. F. Surace
    A. Fagetti
    S. Fozzato
    P. Cherubino
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 69 - 74
  • [35] Two-Year Results of X-Stop Interspinous Implant for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Prospective Study
    Nandakumar, Anjali
    Clark, Natasha A.
    Smith, Francis W.
    Wardlaw, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 26 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [36] Treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis by a percutaneous stand-alone lumbar interspinous implant. Preliminary experience with the Aperius device
    Collignon, F.
    Fransen, P.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2010, 56 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [37] Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review
    Ashwanth Ramesh
    Frank Lyons
    Michael Kelleher
    Neurosurgical Review, 2016, 39 : 197 - 205
  • [38] Device related complications of the Coflex interspinous process implant for the lumbar spine
    ZANG Lei
    DU Peng
    HAI Yong
    SU Qing-jun
    LU Shi-bao
    LIU Tie
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (13) : 2517 - 2522
  • [39] OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT WITH ESTABLISHMENT OF NORMAL VALUES FOR LUMBAR SPINAL RANGE OF MOTION
    FITZGERALD, GK
    WYNVEEN, KJ
    RHEAULT, W
    ROTHSCHILD, B
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (11): : 1776 - 1781
  • [40] Preliminary Study of the Immediate Effect of Spinal Segmental Side Bending Mobilization on Improve Lumbar Range of Motion
    Sato, Tomonori
    Koumori, Takao
    Uchiyama, Yasushi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2012, 24 (05) : 431 - 434