Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

被引:0
|
作者
Robert Gunzburg
Marek Szpalski
Stuart A. Callary
Christopher J. Colloca
Victor Kosmopoulos
Deed Harrison
Robert J. Moore
机构
[1] Eeuwfeestkliniek Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] Hôpitaux Iris Sud/IRIS South Teaching Hospitals,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma
[4] Arizona State University,Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology
[5] University of North Texas Health Science Center,Bone and Joint Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[6] John Peter Smith Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[7] CBP Non-Profit,undefined
[8] Inc.,undefined
[9] Private Practice,undefined
[10] The Adelaide Center for Spinal Research,undefined
[11] Spine Surgery,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Interspinous implant; Biomechanics; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spine; Kinematics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1–L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571–576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1–L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb’s method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interspinous Distraction in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Neurophysiological Perspective
    Schizas, Constantin
    Pralong, Etienne
    Tzioupis, Christopher
    Kulik, Gerit
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (24) : 2113 - 2117
  • [22] The importance of interspinous spacers in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Vinas-Rios, J. M.
    Arabmotlagh, M.
    Rahim, T.
    Schmidt, S.
    Sellei, R. M.
    Rauschmann, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2019, 48 (10): : 831 - 836
  • [23] Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Loguidice, Vito
    Bini, Walter
    Shabat, Shay
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2011, 8 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [24] Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
    Troke, Michael
    Schuit, Dale
    Petersen, Cheryl M.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2007, 8 (1)
  • [25] Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
    Michael Troke
    Dale Schuit
    Cheryl M Petersen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 8
  • [26] Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with aperius perclid interspinous system
    Surace, M. F.
    Fagetti, A.
    Fozzato, S.
    Cherubino, P.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 : S69 - S74
  • [27] Neurophysiological changes during interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis
    Schizas, Constantin
    Pralong, Etienne
    Kulik, Gerit
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S6 - S6
  • [28] Percutaneous Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with a New Interspinous Device
    Salvatore Masala
    Roberto Fiori
    Dario Alberto Bartolucci
    Tommaso Volpi
    Eros Calabria
    Federica Novegno
    Giovanni Simonetti
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 368 - 374
  • [29] Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review
    Ramesh, Ashwanth
    Lyons, Frank
    Kelleher, Michael
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 39 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [30] The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine
    Lindsey, DP
    Swanson, KE
    Fuchs, P
    Hsu, KY
    Zucherman, JF
    Yerby, SA
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (19) : 2192 - 2197