Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

被引:0
|
作者
Robert Gunzburg
Marek Szpalski
Stuart A. Callary
Christopher J. Colloca
Victor Kosmopoulos
Deed Harrison
Robert J. Moore
机构
[1] Eeuwfeestkliniek Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] Hôpitaux Iris Sud/IRIS South Teaching Hospitals,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma
[4] Arizona State University,Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology
[5] University of North Texas Health Science Center,Bone and Joint Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[6] John Peter Smith Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[7] CBP Non-Profit,undefined
[8] Inc.,undefined
[9] Private Practice,undefined
[10] The Adelaide Center for Spinal Research,undefined
[11] Spine Surgery,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Interspinous implant; Biomechanics; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spine; Kinematics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1–L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571–576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1–L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb’s method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: A systematic review
    Intolo, Pattariya
    Milosavljevic, Stephan
    Baxter, David G.
    Carman, Allan B.
    Pal, Poonam
    Munn, Joanne
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (06) : 596 - 604
  • [42] The Effect of Implant Placement on Sacroiliac Joint Range of Motion
    Soriano-Baron, Hector
    Lindsey, Derek P.
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Nestor
    Reyes, Phillip M.
    Newcomb, Anna
    Yerby, Scott A.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (09) : E525 - E530
  • [43] Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Shamie, A. Nick
    Blumenthal, Scott L.
    Orndorff, Douglas
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [44] Toward a cure for lumbar spinal stenosis: The potential of interspinous process decompression
    Block, Jon E.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2019, 132
  • [45] Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review Comment
    Atalay, Basar
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 39 (02) : 205 - 205
  • [46] Restoring lumbar spine stiffness using an interspinous implant in an ovine model of instability
    Szpalski, Marek
    Gunzburg, Robert
    Colloca, Christopher J.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Hegazy, Mostafa Afifi
    Freeman, Brian J.C.
    Fabeck, Laurent
    Clinical Biomechanics, 2016, 33 : 85 - 91
  • [47] A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis
    Yano, Shunsuke
    Hida, Kazutoshi
    Seki, Toshitaka
    Aoyama, Takeshi
    Akino, Minoru
    Iwasaki, Yoshinobu
    NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [48] Lumbar Interspinous Process Fixation and Fusion with Stand-Alone Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion Implant in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Undergoing Decompression for Spinal Stenosis
    Postacchini, Franco
    Postacchini, Roberto
    Menchetti, Pier Paolo Maria
    Sessa, Pasquale
    Paolino, Michela
    Cinotti, Gianluca
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [49] Biomechanical testing of different posterior fusion devices on lumbar spinal range of motion
    Hartmann, Frank
    Nusselt, Thomas
    Maier, Gerrit
    Rommens, Pol Maria
    Gercek, Erol
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 62 : 121 - 126
  • [50] EFFECTS OF PRONE SPINAL EXTENSION EXERCISE ON PASSIVE LUMBAR EXTENSION RANGE OF MOTION
    SMITH, RL
    MELL, DB
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (10): : 1517 - 1521