Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions

被引:19
|
作者
Hartmann, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Dietz, Sven-Oliver [2 ]
Hely, Hans [3 ]
Rommens, Pol Maria [2 ]
Gercek, Erol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Klin & Poliklin Unfallchirurg, Zentrum Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Trauma Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Wiesbaden, Div Phys, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
Interspinous device; Lumbar spine; Biomechanics; Spinal stenosis; Adjacent segment effect; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; PROCESS IMPLANT; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; STENOSIS; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; THORACOLUMBAR; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow lateral bending and axial rotation in the motion segment. The aim of the present study is the biomechanical evaluation of the change in the range of motion of the affected and adjacent segments following implantation of different interspinous devices under load in all directions of motion. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload (follower load of 400 N). The ROM was measured after implantation of Aperius(A (R)) (Kyphon, Mannheim), In-Space(A (R)) (Synthes, Umkirch), X-Stop(A (R)) (Tikom, Furth) and Coflex(A (R)) (Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen) into the segment L3/L4. All interspinous devices caused a significant reduction in extension of the instrumented segment without significantly affecting the other directions of motion. The flexion was reduced by all implants only when the follower load was applied. All devices caused a higher ROM of the whole spine during lateral bending and rotation. The actual evaluated interspinous devices led to a significant reduction in ROM during flexion-extension, but to a significant increase in ROM for the whole specimen (L2-L5) during lateral bending and rotation, which could increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions
    Frank Hartmann
    Sven-Oliver Dietz
    Hans Hely
    Pol Maria Rommens
    Erol Gercek
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131 : 917 - 926
  • [2] Biomechanical testing of different posterior fusion devices on lumbar spinal range of motion
    Hartmann, Frank
    Nusselt, Thomas
    Maier, Gerrit
    Rommens, Pol Maria
    Gercek, Erol
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 62 : 121 - 126
  • [3] Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion
    Gunzburg, Robert
    Szpalski, Marek
    Callary, Stuart A.
    Colloca, Christopher J.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Harrison, Deed
    Moore, Robert J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (05) : 696 - 703
  • [4] Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion
    Robert Gunzburg
    Marek Szpalski
    Stuart A. Callary
    Christopher J. Colloca
    Victor Kosmopoulos
    Deed Harrison
    Robert J. Moore
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 696 - 703
  • [5] Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis
    Zhengpeng Liu
    Shuyi Zhang
    Jia Li
    Hai Tang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [6] Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis
    Liu, Zhengpeng
    Zhang, Shuyi
    Li, Jia
    Tang, Hai
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study
    Shen, Hangkai
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Zhu, Jia
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Liu, Weiqiang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E1112 - E1119
  • [8] Biomechanical Comparison of an Interspinous Device and a Rigid Stabilization on Lumbar Adjacent Segment Range of Motion
    Hartmann, F.
    Dietz, S. O.
    Kuhn, S.
    Hely, H.
    Rommens, P. M.
    Gercek, E.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2011, 78 (05) : 404 - 409
  • [9] Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure
    Wilke, Hans-Joachim
    Drumm, J.
    Haeussler, K.
    Mack, C.
    Steudel, W. -I.
    Kettler, A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (08) : 1049 - 1056
  • [10] Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure
    Hans-Joachim Wilke
    J. Drumm
    K. Häussler
    C. Mack
    W. -I. Steudel
    A. Kettler
    European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 1049 - 1056