Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions

被引:19
|
作者
Hartmann, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Dietz, Sven-Oliver [2 ]
Hely, Hans [3 ]
Rommens, Pol Maria [2 ]
Gercek, Erol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Klin & Poliklin Unfallchirurg, Zentrum Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Trauma Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Wiesbaden, Div Phys, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
Interspinous device; Lumbar spine; Biomechanics; Spinal stenosis; Adjacent segment effect; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; PROCESS IMPLANT; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; STENOSIS; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; THORACOLUMBAR; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow lateral bending and axial rotation in the motion segment. The aim of the present study is the biomechanical evaluation of the change in the range of motion of the affected and adjacent segments following implantation of different interspinous devices under load in all directions of motion. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload (follower load of 400 N). The ROM was measured after implantation of Aperius(A (R)) (Kyphon, Mannheim), In-Space(A (R)) (Synthes, Umkirch), X-Stop(A (R)) (Tikom, Furth) and Coflex(A (R)) (Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen) into the segment L3/L4. All interspinous devices caused a significant reduction in extension of the instrumented segment without significantly affecting the other directions of motion. The flexion was reduced by all implants only when the follower load was applied. All devices caused a higher ROM of the whole spine during lateral bending and rotation. The actual evaluated interspinous devices led to a significant reduction in ROM during flexion-extension, but to a significant increase in ROM for the whole specimen (L2-L5) during lateral bending and rotation, which could increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical assessment of the effect of sublaminar band tensioning on lumbar motion
    Park, Brian J.
    Gold, Colin J.
    Christianson, David
    Watson, Nicole A. DeVries
    Nourski, Kirill V.
    Woodroffe, Royce W.
    Hitchon, Patrick W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 836 - 842
  • [32] Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study
    Erbulut, Deniz U.
    Zafarparandeh, Iman
    Hassan, Chaudhry R.
    Lazoglu, Ismail
    Ozer, Ali F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 23 (02) : 200 - 208
  • [33] Biomechanical Changes in Disc Pressure and Facet Strain after Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with ChariteTM in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload
    Choi, Jong-Il
    Kim, Se-Hoon
    Lim, Dong-Jun
    Ha, Sung-Kon
    Kim, Sang-Dae
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 27 (02) : 252 - 258
  • [34] OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT WITH ESTABLISHMENT OF NORMAL VALUES FOR LUMBAR SPINAL RANGE OF MOTION
    FITZGERALD, GK
    WYNVEEN, KJ
    RHEAULT, W
    ROTHSCHILD, B
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (11): : 1776 - 1781
  • [35] Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies on this motion
    McGregor A.H.
    McCarthy I.D.
    Doré C.J.
    Hughes S.P.
    European Spine Journal, 1997, 6 (5) : 308 - 315
  • [36] Preliminary Study of the Immediate Effect of Spinal Segmental Side Bending Mobilization on Improve Lumbar Range of Motion
    Sato, Tomonori
    Koumori, Takao
    Uchiyama, Yasushi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2012, 24 (05) : 431 - 434
  • [37] The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: A systematic review
    Intolo, Pattariya
    Milosavljevic, Stephan
    Baxter, David G.
    Carman, Allan B.
    Pal, Poonam
    Munn, Joanne
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (06) : 596 - 604
  • [38] A finite element model of the L4-L5 spinal motion segment: Biomechanical compatibility of an interspinous device
    Vena, Pasquale
    Franzoso, Giampaolo
    Gastaldi, Dario
    Contro, Roberto
    Dallolio, Villiam
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2005, 8 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [39] The Changes in Range of Motion after a Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charite™ in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload : A Comparative Study between Load Control Protocol and Hybrid Protocol
    Kim, Se-Hoon
    Chang, Ung-Kyu
    Chang, Jae-Chil
    Chun, Kwon-Soo
    Lim, T. Jesse
    Kim, Daniel H.
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 46 (02) : 144 - 151
  • [40] Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (06): : 702 - 710