Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions

被引:19
|
作者
Hartmann, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Dietz, Sven-Oliver [2 ]
Hely, Hans [3 ]
Rommens, Pol Maria [2 ]
Gercek, Erol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Klin & Poliklin Unfallchirurg, Zentrum Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Trauma Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Wiesbaden, Div Phys, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
Interspinous device; Lumbar spine; Biomechanics; Spinal stenosis; Adjacent segment effect; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; PROCESS IMPLANT; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; STENOSIS; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; THORACOLUMBAR; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow lateral bending and axial rotation in the motion segment. The aim of the present study is the biomechanical evaluation of the change in the range of motion of the affected and adjacent segments following implantation of different interspinous devices under load in all directions of motion. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload (follower load of 400 N). The ROM was measured after implantation of Aperius(A (R)) (Kyphon, Mannheim), In-Space(A (R)) (Synthes, Umkirch), X-Stop(A (R)) (Tikom, Furth) and Coflex(A (R)) (Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen) into the segment L3/L4. All interspinous devices caused a significant reduction in extension of the instrumented segment without significantly affecting the other directions of motion. The flexion was reduced by all implants only when the follower load was applied. All devices caused a higher ROM of the whole spine during lateral bending and rotation. The actual evaluated interspinous devices led to a significant reduction in ROM during flexion-extension, but to a significant increase in ROM for the whole specimen (L2-L5) during lateral bending and rotation, which could increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under follower preload: a finite element study
    Cheng-Fei Du
    Nan Yang
    Jun-Chao Guo
    Yun-Peng Huang
    Chunqiu Zhang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [22] Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment
    Kong, Chao
    Lu, Shibao
    Hai, Yong
    Zang, Lei
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 30 (04) : 355 - 359
  • [23] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE UNDER STATIC CONDITIONS
    VANNEUVILLE, G
    ESCANDE, G
    TANGUY, A
    CHAZAL, J
    GUILLOT, M
    FOURNIER, J
    RODDIER, P
    SEMAINE DES HOPITAUX, 1988, 64 (40): : 2575 - 2581
  • [24] Biomechanical effect of interspinous process distraction height after lumbar fixation surgery: An in vitro model
    Fu, Lin
    Ma, Jianxiong
    Lu, Bin
    Jia, Haobo
    Zhao, Jie
    Kuang, Mingjie
    Feng, Rui
    Xu, Liyan
    Bai, Haohao
    Sun, Lei
    Wang, Ying
    Ma, Xinlong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2017, 237 (07) : 663 - 672
  • [25] Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices
    Tapp, Stephanie J.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04): : 584 - 592
  • [26] Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
    Troke, Michael
    Schuit, Dale
    Petersen, Cheryl M.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2007, 8 (1)
  • [27] Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
    Michael Troke
    Dale Schuit
    Cheryl M Petersen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 8
  • [28] Biomechanical comparison of interspinous distraction device and facet screw fixation system on the motion of lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
    Wang Hongwei
    Wang Xiaohong
    Chen Wenchuan
    Zhao Fuqiang
    Xiang Liangbi
    Zhou Yue
    Cheng Chengkung
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (11) : 2078 - 2084
  • [29] Biomechanical testing of different ventral fixation devices on the bovine lumbar spine
    Flamme, CH
    Hurschler, C
    Heymann, C
    von der Heide, N
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2004, 142 (01): : 88 - 96
  • [30] Biomechanical comparison of interspinous distraction device and facet screw fixation system on the motion of lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
    Wang Hongwei
    Wang Xiaohong
    Chen Wenchuan
    Zhao Fuqiang
    Xiang Liangbi
    Zhou Yue
    Cheng Chengkung
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2014, (11) : 2078 - 2084