Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients
    Deng, Xia
    Han, Ce
    Chen, Shan
    Xie, Congying
    Yi, Jinling
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Jin, Xiance
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [12] Helical Tomotherapy for left-sided breast: dosimetric comparison to Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Ertan, F.
    Tanriseven, R.
    Yazici, O.
    Kocer, A. M.
    Altundag, M. B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S796 - S797
  • [13] A dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy in SBRT
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Narayanasamy, Ganesh
    Licon, Anna Laura
    Myers, Pamela
    Li, Ying
    Crownover, Richard
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (02): : 838 - 843
  • [14] Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in patients of left-sided breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy CONSORT
    Wang, Rui
    Shen, Jun
    Yan, Huanhuan
    Gao, Xitao
    Dong, Tianfu
    Li, Shuqin
    Wang, Peishun
    Zhou, Jun
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (02)
  • [15] Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Gayen, Sanjib
    Kombathula, Harsha
    Manna, Sumanta
    Varshney, Sonal
    Pareek, Puneet
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (02): : 138 - 147
  • [16] Dosimetric Evaluation of Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy (Rapid Arc) for Primary Leiomyosarcoma in the Spine
    Wu, Yong-Zhong
    Jin, Fu
    Wang, Ying
    Zhou, Juan
    Wu, Li-Hua
    He, Guang-Lei
    Qiu, Da
    He, Ya-Nan
    Liu, Xian-Feng
    Zhong, Ming-Song
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (05) : 387 - 394
  • [17] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
    Bai, Wei
    Kou, Changgui
    Yu, Weiying
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Hua, Wanqing
    Yu, Lei
    Wang, Jianfeng
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 7179 - 7186
  • [18] Feasibility of preoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy for early stage breast cancer
    Bota, K.
    Gaede, S.
    Karnas, S.
    Wong, E.
    Yaremko, B.
    Lock, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S136 - S136
  • [19] Dosimetric and delivery characterizations of full-arc and half-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy for maxillary cancer
    Miura, Hideharu
    Fujiwara, Masayuki
    Tanooka, Masao
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Inoue, Hiroyuki
    Takada, Yasuhiro
    Kamikonya, Norihiko
    Hirota, Shozo
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (05) : 785 - 790
  • [20] Dosimetric Comparison of Static Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Dynamic Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience
    Wang, Ruihao
    Zeng, Qingxing
    Luo, Songgui
    Shen, Guohui
    Li, Ping
    Zhang, Shuxu
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020, 10 (03) : 628 - 632