Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric analysis and comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for liver carcinoma
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Schnell, Erich
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 138 - 140
  • [42] Dosimetric Study of Proton Therapy Using Scanning Method for Localized Prostate Cancer Patients in Comparison With Wobbler Method and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Takagi, M.
    Hasegawa, Y.
    Tateoka, K.
    Takada, Y.
    Hareyama, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E528 - E528
  • [43] Dosimetric Predictors of Acute and Chronic Alopecia in Primary Brain Cancer Patients Treated With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Scoccianti, Silvia
    Simontacchi, Gabriele
    Greto, Daniela
    Perna, Marco
    Terziani, Francesca
    Talamonti, Cinzia
    Teriaca, Maria Ausilia
    Caramia, Giorgio
    Lo Russo, Monica
    Olmetto, Emanuela
    Delli Paoli, Camilla
    Grassi, Roberta
    Carfora, Vincenzo
    Saieva, Calogero
    Bonomo, Pierluigi
    Detti, Beatrice
    Mangoni, Monica
    Desideri, Isacco
    Francolini, Giulio
    Di Cataldo, Vanessa
    Marrazzo, Livia
    Pallotta, Stefania
    Livi, Lorenzo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [44] Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw modes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Hsieh, Y. T.
    Chou, C. Y.
    Huang, B. S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S880 - S880
  • [45] Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and a hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy and segmented field-in-field technique for postmastectomy chest wall and regional lymph node irradiation
    Lang, Karen
    Loritz, Brianne
    Schwartz, Adam
    Hunzeker, Ashley
    Lenards, Nishele
    Culp, Lee
    Finley, Randi
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [46] Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and field-in-field technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer
    Cheng, Hao-Wen
    Chang, Chih-Chieh
    Shiau, An-Cheng
    Wang, Ming-Hua
    Tsai, Jo-Ting
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [47] A Single Institution's Experience of Definitive Radiotherapy Using Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy for Hypopharyngeal Cancers
    Kubo, Katsumaro
    Murakami, Yuji
    Imano, Nobuki
    Takeuchi, Yuki
    Nishibuchi, Ikuno
    Kimura, Tomoki
    Kawahara, Daisuke
    Miki, Kentaro
    Saito, Akito
    Nakashima, Takeo
    Hamamoto, Takao
    Ueda, Tsutomu
    Takeno, Sachio
    Nagata, Yasushi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (07) : 4183 - 4190
  • [48] A Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and IMRT for Cochlea-sparing Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Nanda, Siddhartha
    Parida, Sourajit
    Ahirwar, Manish Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 48 (03) : 248 - 251
  • [49] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Ren, Wenting
    Sun, Chao
    Lu, Ningning
    Xu, Yingjie
    Han, Fei
    Liu, Yue Ping
    Dai, Jianrong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 254 - 262
  • [50] Does volumetric-modulated arc therapy improve anal cancer treatment outcome and reduce toxicity: A single institution experience.
    Pan, Ming
    Rai, Nitin
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (08)