Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in total scalp irradiation: a single institutional experience
    Ostheimer, Christian
    Huebsch, Patrick
    Janich, Martin
    Gerlach, Reinhard
    Vordermark, Dirk
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 34 (04): : 313 - 321
  • [32] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [33] Dosimetric Comparison of Hypofractionated Regimen in Breast Cancer Using Two Different Techniques: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Prasun, Pallav
    Kharade, Vipin
    Pal, Vikas
    Gupta, Manish
    Das, Saikat
    Pasricha, Rajesh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [34] Feasibility of accelerated partial breast irradiation with volumetric-modulated arc therapy in elderly and frail patients
    Olivier Riou
    Pascal Fenoglietto
    Céline Bourgier
    Olivier Lauche
    Fatiha Boulbair
    Marie Charissoux
    Angélique Ducteil
    Norbert Aillères
    Claire Lemanski
    David Azria
    Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [35] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): A modern radiotherapy technique - A single institutional experience
    Rashid, Azhar
    Ahmed, Zaeem
    Memom, Muhammad Ali
    Hashim, Abdul Sattar M.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (02) : 355 - 361
  • [36] Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Cheng, ChihYao
    Zheng, Yuanshui
    Hsi, Wen
    Zeidan, Omar
    Schreuder, Niek
    Vargas, Carlos
    Larson, Gary
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (03): : 335 - 348
  • [37] Feasibility of accelerated partial breast irradiation with volumetric-modulated arc therapy in elderly and frail patients
    Riou, Olivier
    Fenoglietto, Pascal
    Bourgier, Celine
    Lauche, Olivier
    Boulbair, Fatiha
    Charissoux, Marie
    Ducteil, Angelique
    Ailleres, Norbert
    Lemanski, Claire
    Azria, David
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [38] Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Angiosarcoma of the Scalp
    Mizuno, Tomoki
    Tomita, Natsuo
    Takaoka, Taiki
    Tomida, Masashi
    Fukuma, Hiroshi
    Tsuchiya, Takahiro
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [39] Dosimetric comparison between modulated arc therapy and static intensity modulated radiotherapy in thoracic esophageal cancer: a single institutional experience
    Choi, Kyu Hye
    Kim, Jina
    Lee, Sea-Won
    Kang, Young-nam
    Jang, HongSeok
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 36 (01): : 63 - 70
  • [40] Comparison of dosimetric benefits in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients among intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and tomotherapy
    Xiong, W.
    Guoqiang, X.
    Wang, Q.
    Xu, T.
    Cao, R.
    Zhu, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S793 - S793