Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

被引:7
|
作者
Higgins, John V. [1 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [4 ]
Jaffe, Allan S. [3 ]
Dalzell, Connie [2 ]
Acker, Nancy [2 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [4 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [2 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [2 ]
Kapa, Suraj [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Dis, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Heart Rhythm Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Cardiac troponin; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; IN-VIVO; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; 1.5; TESLA; SAFETY; LEADS; MRI; VITRO; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-015-0064-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been safely performed in many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) using institution-specific protocols. A potential risk of MRI is myocardial heating and cardiac injury, which might be detectable with cardiac Troponin (cTn). We evaluated this in patients with CIEDs undergoing MRI. Prospective data were collected from 2008 to the present in patients with CIEDs undergoing clinically indicated MRI performed under institutional protocol. Cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) levels were drawn both before and 24-36 h after the procedure. The collective data were retrospectively analyzed. MRI exams (n = 512) were performed in 398 patients. Of these, there were 348 unique scans with cTnT recorded before and after MRI (median age 68, IQ 56-78; 62 % men). cTnT did not significantly change for the group as a whole (0.00 +/- 0.056). There were 22 (6.3 %) exams with cTnT change a parts per thousand yen0.002 ng/mL following MRI (range 0.01-0.09 ng/mL). There were no clinically significant events in these patients directly attributable to MR. There were no significant changes in pacing threshold or impedance in the group with elevated cardiac biomarkers. There are very few situations where myocardial injury as detected by cTnT in patients undergoing MRI with CIEDs could be detected. No adverse clinical events or functional changes of the device were noted, even in those with increases in cTnT. Our experience supports that MRI can be performed safely for appropriately selected patients under close clinical observation. Proactive monitoring with the present iteration of cardiac biomarkers appears to be of limited utility, but prospective monitoring with high sensitivity assays may be able to detect subclinical myocardial damage.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices
    Sierra, Mark
    Machado, Christian
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 232 - 238
  • [12] Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Strom, Jordan B.
    Whelan, Jill B.
    Shen, Changyu
    Zheng, Shuang Qi
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (08) : 1138 - 1144
  • [13] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads
    Schaller, Robert D.
    Brunker, Tamara
    Riley, Michael P.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Litt, Harold
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05) : 549 - 556
  • [14] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study
    Navarro-Valverde, Cristina
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    Jose Romero-Reyes, M.
    Esteve-Ruiz, Irene
    Garcia-Medina, Dolores
    Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo
    Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal
    Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan
    Cayuela, Aurelio
    Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 91 : 9 - 15
  • [15] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Challenges and Solutions
    Rajiah, Prabhakar
    Kay, Fernando
    Bolen, Michael
    Patel, Amit R.
    Landeras, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 35 (01) : W1 - W17
  • [16] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination in People with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Gillam, Marianne H.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Pratt, Nicole L.
    Roughead, Elizabeth E.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 125 - 126
  • [17] Synopsis of JBS recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Zghaib, Tarek
    Nazarian, Saman
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04) : 225 - 227
  • [18] Is diversity harmful?-Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Koenig, Christoph Alexander
    Tinhofer, Florian
    Puntus, Thomas
    Burger, Achim Leo
    Neubauer, Nikolaus
    Langenberger, Herbert
    Huber, Kurt
    Nuernberg, Michael
    Zweiker, David
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2022, 134 (7-8) : 286 - 293
  • [19] Is diversity harmful?—Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Christoph Alexander König
    Florian Tinhofer
    Thomas Puntus
    Achim Leo Burger
    Nikolaus Neubauer
    Herbert Langenberger
    Kurt Huber
    Michael Nürnberg
    David Zweiker
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022, 134 : 286 - 293
  • [20] SAFETY OF CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WITH NON-CONDITIONAL CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Eyvazian, Vaughn
    Do, Duc H.
    Bayoneta, Aileen Joy
    Finn, J.
    Boyle, Noel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 429 - 429