Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

被引:7
|
作者
Higgins, John V. [1 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [4 ]
Jaffe, Allan S. [3 ]
Dalzell, Connie [2 ]
Acker, Nancy [2 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [4 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [2 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [2 ]
Kapa, Suraj [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Dis, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Heart Rhythm Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Cardiac troponin; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; IN-VIVO; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; 1.5; TESLA; SAFETY; LEADS; MRI; VITRO; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-015-0064-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been safely performed in many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) using institution-specific protocols. A potential risk of MRI is myocardial heating and cardiac injury, which might be detectable with cardiac Troponin (cTn). We evaluated this in patients with CIEDs undergoing MRI. Prospective data were collected from 2008 to the present in patients with CIEDs undergoing clinically indicated MRI performed under institutional protocol. Cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) levels were drawn both before and 24-36 h after the procedure. The collective data were retrospectively analyzed. MRI exams (n = 512) were performed in 398 patients. Of these, there were 348 unique scans with cTnT recorded before and after MRI (median age 68, IQ 56-78; 62 % men). cTnT did not significantly change for the group as a whole (0.00 +/- 0.056). There were 22 (6.3 %) exams with cTnT change a parts per thousand yen0.002 ng/mL following MRI (range 0.01-0.09 ng/mL). There were no clinically significant events in these patients directly attributable to MR. There were no significant changes in pacing threshold or impedance in the group with elevated cardiac biomarkers. There are very few situations where myocardial injury as detected by cTnT in patients undergoing MRI with CIEDs could be detected. No adverse clinical events or functional changes of the device were noted, even in those with increases in cTnT. Our experience supports that MRI can be performed safely for appropriately selected patients under close clinical observation. Proactive monitoring with the present iteration of cardiac biomarkers appears to be of limited utility, but prospective monitoring with high sensitivity assays may be able to detect subclinical myocardial damage.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Beyond the AJR: "Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads"
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (05) : 1247 - 1247
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in a cardio-oncology center
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    Dyrbus, Maciej
    Wojtynek, Elzbieta
    Wojtaszczyk, Adam
    Rutkowski, Tomasz
    Niedziela, Jacek
    Blachut, Aleksandra
    Jarzab, Michal
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Kurek, Anna
    Gorol, Jaroslaw
    Witek, Mateusz
    Skladowski, Krzysztof
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Bobek-Bilewicz, Barbara
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 81 (06) : 619 - 621
  • [23] Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Epicardial or Abandoned Leads
    Gakenheimer-Smith, Lindsey
    Etheridge, Susan
    Ou, Zhining
    Presson, Angela
    Whitaker, Patricia
    Su, Jason
    Puchalski, Michael
    Asaki, Sarah Y.
    Niu, Mary
    Pilcher, Thomas
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [24] Remote programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A novel approach to program cardiac devices for magnetic resonance imaging
    Siddamsetti, Sisir
    Shinn, Alexander
    Gautam, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) : 1005 - 1009
  • [25] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Are They Truly Still "Enemies"?
    Fogante, Marco
    Volpato, Giovanni
    Pirani, Paolo Esposto
    Cela, Fatjon
    Compagnucci, Paolo
    Valeri, Yari
    Selimi, Adelina
    Alfieri, Michele
    Brugiatelli, Leonardo
    Belleggia, Sara
    Coraducci, Francesca
    Argalia, Giulio
    Casella, Michela
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Schicchi, Nicolo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [26] Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices
    Buendia, Francisco
    Cano, Oscar
    Miguel Sanchez-Gomez, Juan
    Igual, Begona
    Osca, Joaquin
    Jose Sancho-Tello, Maria
    Olaguee, Jose
    Salvador, Antonio
    EUROPACE, 2011, 13 (04): : 533 - 538
  • [27] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Yadava, Mrinal
    Nugent, Matthew
    Krebsbach, Angela
    Minnier, Jessica
    Jessel, Peter
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 50 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [28] Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bhuva, Anish
    Charles-Edwards, Geoff
    Ashmore, Jonathan
    Lipton, Alexandra
    Benbow, Matthew
    Grainger, David
    Lobban, Trudie
    Gopalan, Deepa
    Slade, Alistair
    Roditi, Giles
    Manisty, Charlotte
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [29] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience
    Fluschnik, Nina
    Tahir, Enver
    Erley, Jennifer
    Muellerleile, Kai
    Metzner, Andreas
    Wenzel, Jan-Per
    Guerreiro, Helena
    Adam, Gerhard
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Toennis, Tobias
    Nikorowitsch, Julius
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (02): : 571 - 577
  • [30] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Mrinal Yadava
    Matthew Nugent
    Angela Krebsbach
    Jessica Minnier
    Peter Jessel
    Charles A. Henrikson
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2017, 50 : 95 - 104