Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices

被引:32
|
作者
Buendia, Francisco [1 ]
Cano, Oscar [1 ]
Miguel Sanchez-Gomez, Juan [1 ]
Igual, Begona [2 ]
Osca, Joaquin [1 ]
Jose Sancho-Tello, Maria [1 ]
Olaguee, Jose [1 ]
Salvador, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Fe, Dept Cardiol, Valencia 46009, Spain
[2] ERESA, Dept Radiol, Valencia, Spain
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Pacemaker; IMPLANTABLE-CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; IN-VITRO; VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; ABSORPTION RATE; MRI; SAFETY; TESLA; ICDS; 3.0-TESLA;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euq501
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Recent studies suggest that non-cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning can be performed safely in selected cardiac rhythm device patients. However, little is known about the safety of performing specific cardiac MRI in this setting. We sought to determine the feasibility of cardiac MRI in patients with pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Methods and rsesults Thirty-eight patients underwent a total of 39 (8 ICDs and 31 PM) cardiac MRI examinations at 1.5 T using usual protocols without specific absorption rate (SAR) restrictions. Nine PM-dependent patients were included. All devices were interrogated before and immediately after MRI. During the scan, pacing mode was programmed to asynchronous for PM-dependent patients whereas ICDs were programmed to a monitor-only mode. All devices were functioning appropriately after cardiac MRI. Comparison of device parameters obtained before and immediately after MRI revealed no significant changes in pacing threshold, lead impedance, battery status, or sensing signal amplitude. Neither clinical events nor patient complaints were reported. Significant imaging artefacts were present on 11 of 39 scans (28.2%). These artefacts were significantly more frequent in ICDs (8 of 8, 100%) vs. PMs (3 of 31, 9.7%) (P < 0.001). Diagnostic questions were answered in 92.3% of the cases, with just three pronounced artefacts preventing an adequate diagnosis in three ICD patients. Conclusions Our results suggest that cardiac MRI may be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with close monitoring during the scan without limitation of peak SAR level using several precautionary measures. Image artefacts were more frequent in ICD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 538
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expanding Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices
    Culbertson, Collin J.
    Gold, Carl A.
    [J]. JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2018, 75 (10) : 1173 - 1174
  • [2] Trends in Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stroke Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices
    Culbertson, Collin J.
    Perino, Alexander C.
    Gardner, Rebecca M.
    Balasubramanian, Vidhya
    Vora, Nirali
    [J]. NEUROHOSPITALIST, 2022, 12 (04): : 624 - 631
  • [3] Trends in Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stroke Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices.
    Culbertson, Collin J.
    Perino, Alexander C.
    Gardner, Rebecca M.
    Balasubramanian, Vidhya
    Vora, Nirali
    [J]. STROKE, 2021, 52
  • [4] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    John V. Higgins
    Robert E. Watson
    Allan S. Jaffe
    Connie Dalzell
    Nancy Acker
    Joel P. Felmlee
    Samuel J. Asirvatham
    Yong-Mei Cha
    Paul A. Friedman
    Suraj Kapa
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 45 : 91 - 97
  • [5] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Higgins, John V.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Dalzell, Connie
    Acker, Nancy
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Kapa, Suraj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [6] Reproducible Safety Protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cardiac Rhythm Devices
    Burke, Peter
    Alexander, Patrick
    Daccarett, Marcos
    Machado, Christian
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S710 - S711
  • [7] Magnetic resonance Imaging of Implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla
    Gimbel, J. Rod
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (07): : 795 - 801
  • [8] Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices
    Nazarian, Saman
    Hansford, Rozann
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Weltin, Valeria
    McVeigh, Diana
    Ipek, Esra Gucuk
    Kwan, Alan
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Calkins, Hugh
    Lardo, Albert C.
    Kraut, Michael A.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Zimmerman, Stefan L.
    Halperin, Henry R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (26): : 2555 - 2564
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices
    Sierra, Mark
    Machado, Christian
    [J]. REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 232 - 238
  • [10] Safe magnetic resonance imaging scanning of patients with cardiac rhythm devices: A role for computer modeling
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Albert, Timothy
    Lazebnik, Mariya
    Park, Sung-Min
    Edmonson, Jonathan
    Herberg, Ben
    Golnitz, John
    Wixon, Sandy
    Peltier, Joel
    Yoon, Hyun
    Willey, Sarah
    Safriel, Yair
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (12) : 1815 - 1821