Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

被引:7
|
作者
Higgins, John V. [1 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [4 ]
Jaffe, Allan S. [3 ]
Dalzell, Connie [2 ]
Acker, Nancy [2 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [4 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [2 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [2 ]
Kapa, Suraj [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Dis, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Heart Rhythm Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Cardiac troponin; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; IN-VIVO; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; 1.5; TESLA; SAFETY; LEADS; MRI; VITRO; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-015-0064-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been safely performed in many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) using institution-specific protocols. A potential risk of MRI is myocardial heating and cardiac injury, which might be detectable with cardiac Troponin (cTn). We evaluated this in patients with CIEDs undergoing MRI. Prospective data were collected from 2008 to the present in patients with CIEDs undergoing clinically indicated MRI performed under institutional protocol. Cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) levels were drawn both before and 24-36 h after the procedure. The collective data were retrospectively analyzed. MRI exams (n = 512) were performed in 398 patients. Of these, there were 348 unique scans with cTnT recorded before and after MRI (median age 68, IQ 56-78; 62 % men). cTnT did not significantly change for the group as a whole (0.00 +/- 0.056). There were 22 (6.3 %) exams with cTnT change a parts per thousand yen0.002 ng/mL following MRI (range 0.01-0.09 ng/mL). There were no clinically significant events in these patients directly attributable to MR. There were no significant changes in pacing threshold or impedance in the group with elevated cardiac biomarkers. There are very few situations where myocardial injury as detected by cTnT in patients undergoing MRI with CIEDs could be detected. No adverse clinical events or functional changes of the device were noted, even in those with increases in cTnT. Our experience supports that MRI can be performed safely for appropriately selected patients under close clinical observation. Proactive monitoring with the present iteration of cardiac biomarkers appears to be of limited utility, but prospective monitoring with high sensitivity assays may be able to detect subclinical myocardial damage.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    John V. Higgins
    Robert E. Watson
    Allan S. Jaffe
    Connie Dalzell
    Nancy Acker
    Joel P. Felmlee
    Samuel J. Asirvatham
    Yong-Mei Cha
    Paul A. Friedman
    Suraj Kapa
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 45 : 91 - 97
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Maass, A. H.
    Hemels, M. E. W.
    Allaart, C. P.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 26 (12) : 584 - 590
  • [3] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    A. H. Maass
    M. E. W. Hemels
    C. P. Allaart
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2018, 26 : 584 - 590
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Eyal, Allon
    Roguin, Ariel
    CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (14) : E176 - E178
  • [5] Automatic consultation system for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Donghoon Han
    Ji Hyun Lee
    Il-Young Oh
    In-ho Chae
    Ho-Young Lee
    Youngjin Cho
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 21 (1)
  • [6] The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dandamudi, Sanjay
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Carr, James C.
    Mongkolwat, Pat
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Tomson, Todd T.
    Verma, Nishant
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alex B.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 1498 - 1505
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Yang, Eunice
    Suzuki, Masahito
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 32 (07) : 440 - 447
  • [8] Considerations for stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chyou, Janice Y.
    Axel, Leon
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2136 - 2138
  • [9] Performing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Contemporary Review
    Blissett, Sarah
    Chetrit, Michael
    Kovacina, Bojan
    Mardigyan, Vartan
    Afilalo, Jonathan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (12) : 1682 - 1686
  • [10] Implantable Electronic Cardiac Devices and Compatibility With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Miller, Jared D.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (14) : 1590 - 1598