Optimizing the anode-filter combination in the sense of image quality and average glandular dose in digital mammography

被引:2
|
作者
Varjonen, Mari [1 ]
Stroemmer, Pekka [1 ]
机构
[1] Planmed Oy, FIN-00880 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
digital mammography (DM); average glandular dose (AGD); amorphous selenium (a-Se);
D O I
10.1117/12.768083
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This paper presents the optimized image quality and average glandular dose in digital mammography, and provides recommendations concerning anode-filter combinations in digital mammography, which is based on amorphous selenium (a-Se) detector technology. The full field digital mammography (FFDM) system based on a-Se technology, which is also a platform of tomosynthesis prototype, was used in this study. X-ray tube anode-filter combinations, which we studied, were tungsten (W) - rhodium (Rh) and tungsten (W) - silver (Ag). Anatomically adaptable fully automatic exposure control (AAEC) was used. The average glandular doses (AGD) were calculated using a specific program developed by Planmed, which automates the method described by Dance et al. Image quality was evaluated in two different ways: a subjective image quality evaluation, and contrast and noise analysis. By using W-Rh and W-Ag anode-filter combinations can be achieved a significantly lower average glandular dose compared with molybdenum (Mo) - molybdenum (Mo) or Mo-Rh. The average glandular dose reduction was achieved from 25 % to 60 %. In the future, the evaluation will concentrate to study more filter combinations and the effect of higher W (>35 W) values, which seems be useful while optimizing the dose in digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography
    Nassar, Joyce
    Rizk, Chadia
    Fares, Georges
    Tohme, Carla
    Braidy, Chady
    Farah, Jad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [22] Optimizing full-field digital mammography techniques: The influence of target-filter and peak voltage settings on lesion detection and average glandular dose
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 108 - 110
  • [23] Average glandular dose with full-field digital mammography - Clinical results
    Hermann, KP
    Kehbel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 502 - 504
  • [24] Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography
    Kawaguchi A.
    Matsunaga Y.
    Otsuka T.
    Suzuki S.
    [J]. Radiological Physics and Technology, 2014, 7 (1) : 102 - 108
  • [25] A Mammography Phantom to Measure Mean Glandular Dose and Image Quality
    Lopez-Pineda, E.
    Ruiz-Trejo, C.
    Brandan, M. E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06)
  • [26] Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data
    Bouwman, R. W.
    van Engen, R. E.
    Young, K. C.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    Schopphoven, S.
    Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N.
    Veldkamp, W. J. H.
    Dance, D. R.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (20): : 7893 - 7907
  • [27] NORMALIZED AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSE IN MOLYBDENUM TARGET RHODIUM FILTER AND RHODIUM TARGET RHODIUM FILTER MAMMOGRAPHY
    WU, XZ
    GINGOLD, EL
    BARNES, GT
    TUCKER, DM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [28] Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography
    Fausto, Agnes M. F.
    Lopes, M. C.
    de Sousa, M. C.
    Furquim, Tania A. C.
    Mol, Anderson W.
    Velasco, Fermin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [29] Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography
    Agnes M. F. Fausto
    M. C. Lopes
    M. C. de Sousa
    Tânia A. C. Furquim
    Anderson W. Mol
    Fermin G. Velasco
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 185 - 196
  • [30] Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography
    Jakubiak, R. R.
    Gamba, H. R.
    Neves, E. B.
    Peixoto, J. E.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (18): : 6565 - 6583