Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data

被引:41
|
作者
Bouwman, R. W. [1 ]
van Engen, R. E. [1 ]
Young, K. C. [2 ,3 ]
den Heeten, G. J. [1 ,4 ]
Broeders, M. J. M. [1 ,5 ]
Schopphoven, S. [6 ]
Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N. [7 ]
Veldkamp, W. J. H. [1 ,8 ]
Dance, D. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr LRCB, Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, NL-6503 GJ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, NCCPM, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, RIHS, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Reference Ctr Mammog Southwest Germany, D-35037 Marburg, Germany
[7] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 20期
关键词
digital mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; average glandular dose; phantoms; population dose; POPULATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7893
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
For the evaluation of the average glandular dose (AGD) in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) phantoms simulating standard model breasts are used. These phantoms consist of slabs of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or a combination of PMMA and polyethylene (PE). In the last decades the automatic exposure control (AEC) increased in complexity and became more sensitive to (local) differences in breast composition. The question is how well the AGD estimated using these simple dosimetry phantoms agrees with the average patient AGD. In this study the AGDs for both dosimetry phantoms and for patients have been evaluated for 5 different x-ray systems in DM and DBT modes. It was found that the ratios between patient and phantom AGD did not differ considerably using both dosimetry phantoms. These ratios averaged over all breast thicknesses were 1.14 and 1.15 for the PMMA and PMMA-PE dosimetry phantoms respectively in DM mode and 1.00 and 1.02 in the DBT mode. These ratios were deemed to be sufficiently close to unity to be suitable for dosimetry evaluation in quality control procedures. However care should be taken when comparing systems for DM and DBT since depending on the AEC operation, ratios for particular breast thicknesses may differ substantially (0.83-1.96). Although the predictions of both phantoms are similar we advise the use of PMMA + PE slabs for both DM and DBT to harmonize dosimetry protocols and avoid any potential issues with the use of spacers with the PMMA phantoms.
引用
收藏
页码:7893 / 7907
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis
    Olgar, T.
    Kahn, T.
    Gosch, D.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (10): : 911 - 918
  • [2] Digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of figures of merit for various average glandular doses
    Kim, Ye-seul
    Park, Hye-Suk
    Park, SuJin
    Kim, Hee-Joung
    Choi, Jae-Gu
    Choi, Young-Wook
    Park, Jun-Ho
    Lee, Jae-Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 62 (09) : 1346 - 1353
  • [3] Digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of figures of merit for various average glandular doses
    Ye-seul Kim
    Hye-Suk Park
    SuJin Park
    Hee-Joung Kim
    Jae-Gu Choi
    Young-Wook Choi
    Jun-Ho Park
    Jae-Jun Lee
    [J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2013, 62 : 1346 - 1353
  • [4] Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Teoh, Kar Choon
    Manan, Hanani Abdul
    Norsuddin, Norhashimah Mohd
    Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [5] In vivo average glandular dose evaluation: one-to-one comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography
    Cavagnetto, Francesca
    Taccini, Gianni
    Rosasco, Raffaella
    Bampi, Rossana
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2013, 157 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [6] Impact of age and breast thickness on mean glandular dose of standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Norsuddin, Norhashimah Mohd
    Sin, Justine Go Mei
    Ravintaran, Rathieswari
    Arasaratnam, Shantini
    Karim, Muhammad Khalis Abdul
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2023, 192
  • [7] Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT
    Sarno, A.
    Mettivier, G.
    Di Lillo, F.
    Tucciariello, R. M.
    Bliznakova, K.
    Russo, P.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 55 : 142 - 148
  • [8] Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Fusco, Roberta
    Raiano, Nicola
    Raiano, Concetta
    Maio, Francesca
    Vallone, Paolo
    Raso, Mauro Mattace
    Setola, Sergio Venanzio
    Granata, Vincenza
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    Barretta, Maria Lusia
    Petrosino, Teresa
    Petrillo, Antonella
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 126
  • [9] A new breast phantom suitable for digital mammography, contrast-enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Zhang, Changsheng
    Fu, Jian
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04):
  • [10] Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Cepeda Martins, A. R.
    Di Maria, S.
    Afonso, J.
    Pereira, M.
    Pereira, J.
    Vaz, P.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2022, 28 (02) : 333 - 339