Digital mammography screening: Average glandular dose and first performance parameters

被引:20
|
作者
Weigel, S.
Girnus, R.
Czwoydzinski, J.
Decker, T.
Spital, S.
Heindel, W.
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, Referenzzentrum Mammografie Screening Einheit, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Gerhard Domagk Inst Pathol, Brust Screening Referenzpathol, Munster, Germany
[4] Screening Einheit Munster Sud Coesfeld, Munster, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; mammography screening; digital mammography; average glandular dose; breast cancer detection rate;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-963387
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Radiation Protection Commission demanded structured implementation of digital mammography screening in Germany. The main requirements were the installation of digital reference centers and separate evaluation of the fully digitized screening units. Digital mammography screening must meet the quality standards of the European guidelines and must be compared to analog screening results. We analyzed early surrogate indicators of effective screening and dosage levels for the first German digital screening unit in a routine setting after the first half of the initial screening round. Materials and Methods: We used three digital mammography screening units (one full-field digital scanner [DR] and two computed radiography systems 1CRI). Each system has been proven to fulfill the requirements of the National and European guidelines. The radiation exposure levels, the medical workflow and the histological results were documented in a central electronic screening record. Results: In the first year 11,413 women were screened (participation rate 57.5%). The parenchymal dosages for the three marnmographic X-ray systems, averaged for the different breast sizes, were 0.7 (DR), 1.3 (CR), 1.5 (CR) mGy. 7% of the screened women needed to undergo further examinations. The total number of screen-detected cancers was 129 (detection rate 1.1 %). 21 % of the carcinomas were classified as ductal carcinomas in situ, 40% of the invasive carcinomas had a histological size <= 10mm and 61 % < 15 mm. The frequency distribution of pTcategories of screen-detected cancer was as follows: pTis 20.9%, pTl 61.2%, pT2 14.7%, pT3 2.3%, pT4 0.8%. 73% of the invasive carcinomas were node-negative. Conclusion: The average glandular dose for all three digital screening units was below the AGD of the analog mammography screening units (1.7 m ' Gy) used in the German trial projects. Nevertheless, the performance indicators of the European guidelines were fulfilled with respect to the prevalent tumor detection rate and tumor size distribution while meeting an acceptable recall rate. This first evaluation of a digital screening unit in Germany demonstrates that the quality standards are met at lower radiation dosage levels than in screen-film mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 895
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In vivo average glandular dose evaluation: one-to-one comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography
    Cavagnetto, Francesca
    Taccini, Gianni
    Rosasco, Raffaella
    Bampi, Rossana
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2013, 157 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [42] Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme
    McCullagh, J. B.
    Baldelli, P.
    Phelan, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 (1007): : 1027 - 1033
  • [43] Analysis of Half-Value Layer and Average Glandular Dose for Mammography Using Gate
    Mohammed Talbi
    Mohammed Khalis
    Rajaa Sebihi
    Oussama Nhila
    M’hamed El Mansouri
    El Mahjoub Chakir
    Zakaria Tahiri
    Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2021, 76 : S95 - S102
  • [44] Evaluation of Image Quality and Average Glandular Dose Using the Resolution Testing Phantom in Mammography
    Chao, Y. T.
    Chen, C. Y.
    Dong, S. L.
    1ST GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING & 9TH ASIAN-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 47 : 144 - 146
  • [45] Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients
    Klein, R
    Aichinger, H
    Dierker, J
    Jansen, JTM
    JoiteBarfuss, S
    Sabel, M
    SchulzWendtland, R
    Zoetelief, J
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (04): : 651 - 671
  • [46] Performance Parameters for Mammography Screening Reply
    Gromet, Matthew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (05) : W205 - W205
  • [47] Analysis of Half-Value Layer and Average Glandular Dose for Mammography Using Gate
    Talbi, Mohammed
    Khalis, Mohammed
    Sebihi, Rajaa
    Nhila, Oussama
    El Mansouri, M'hamed
    Chakir, El Mahjoub
    Tahiri, Zakaria
    MOSCOW UNIVERSITY PHYSICS BULLETIN, 2021, 76 (SUPPL 1) : S95 - S102
  • [48] Intra-individual Comparison of Average Glandular Dose of Two Digital Mammography Units using Different Anode/Filter Combinations
    Engelken, Florian J. F.
    Meyer, Henning
    Juran, Ralf
    Bick, Ulrich
    Fallenberg, Eva
    Diekmann, Felix
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) : 1272 - 1280
  • [49] Reporting average glandular dose and its associations with age and exposure parameters
    Albeshan, Salman M.
    Alhulail, Ahmad A.
    Almuqbil, Maha M.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 223
  • [50] Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography
    Shinohara, Sae
    Araki, Fujio
    Maeda, Megumi
    Okamoto, Rumi
    Nakamura, Mai
    Higashida, Yoshiharu
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2020, 40 (04) : 1429 - 1443