Digital mammography screening: Average glandular dose and first performance parameters

被引:20
|
作者
Weigel, S.
Girnus, R.
Czwoydzinski, J.
Decker, T.
Spital, S.
Heindel, W.
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, Referenzzentrum Mammografie Screening Einheit, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Gerhard Domagk Inst Pathol, Brust Screening Referenzpathol, Munster, Germany
[4] Screening Einheit Munster Sud Coesfeld, Munster, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; mammography screening; digital mammography; average glandular dose; breast cancer detection rate;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-963387
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Radiation Protection Commission demanded structured implementation of digital mammography screening in Germany. The main requirements were the installation of digital reference centers and separate evaluation of the fully digitized screening units. Digital mammography screening must meet the quality standards of the European guidelines and must be compared to analog screening results. We analyzed early surrogate indicators of effective screening and dosage levels for the first German digital screening unit in a routine setting after the first half of the initial screening round. Materials and Methods: We used three digital mammography screening units (one full-field digital scanner [DR] and two computed radiography systems 1CRI). Each system has been proven to fulfill the requirements of the National and European guidelines. The radiation exposure levels, the medical workflow and the histological results were documented in a central electronic screening record. Results: In the first year 11,413 women were screened (participation rate 57.5%). The parenchymal dosages for the three marnmographic X-ray systems, averaged for the different breast sizes, were 0.7 (DR), 1.3 (CR), 1.5 (CR) mGy. 7% of the screened women needed to undergo further examinations. The total number of screen-detected cancers was 129 (detection rate 1.1 %). 21 % of the carcinomas were classified as ductal carcinomas in situ, 40% of the invasive carcinomas had a histological size <= 10mm and 61 % < 15 mm. The frequency distribution of pTcategories of screen-detected cancer was as follows: pTis 20.9%, pTl 61.2%, pT2 14.7%, pT3 2.3%, pT4 0.8%. 73% of the invasive carcinomas were node-negative. Conclusion: The average glandular dose for all three digital screening units was below the AGD of the analog mammography screening units (1.7 m ' Gy) used in the German trial projects. Nevertheless, the performance indicators of the European guidelines were fulfilled with respect to the prevalent tumor detection rate and tumor size distribution while meeting an acceptable recall rate. This first evaluation of a digital screening unit in Germany demonstrates that the quality standards are met at lower radiation dosage levels than in screen-film mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 895
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital Mammography Screening with Photon-counting Technique: Can a High Diagnostic Performance Be Realized at Low Mean Glandular Dose?
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Berkemeyer, Shoma
    Girnus, Ralf
    Sommer, Alexander
    Lenzen, Horst
    Heindel, Walter
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (02) : 345 - 355
  • [32] Performance Parameters for Mammography Screening
    Ellis, Richard L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (05) : W204 - W204
  • [33] EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE IN MAMMOGRAPHY: LIMITATIONS OF AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSE AND PROPOSAL OF A NEW QUANTITY
    Geeraert, N.
    Klausz, R.
    Muller, S.
    Bloch, I.
    Bosmans, H.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 165 (1-4) : 342 - 345
  • [34] CALCULATION OF AIR KERMA TO AVERAGE GLANDULAR TISSUE DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR MAMMOGRAPHY
    ZOETELIEF, J
    JANSEN, JTM
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1995, 57 (1-4) : 397 - 400
  • [35] ASSESSING IMAGE QUALITY AND ESTIMATING THE GLANDULAR AVERAGE DOSE IN SOME MAMMOGRAPHY LABS
    Mossang, D.
    Dadulescu, E.
    ROMANIAN REPORTS IN PHYSICS, 2011, 63 (01) : 95 - 106
  • [36] Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Skaane, Per
    Gullien, Randi
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine Traegde
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (03):
  • [37] Digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of figures of merit for various average glandular doses
    Kim, Ye-seul
    Park, Hye-Suk
    Park, SuJin
    Kim, Hee-Joung
    Choi, Jae-Gu
    Choi, Young-Wook
    Park, Jun-Ho
    Lee, Jae-Jun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 62 (09) : 1346 - 1353
  • [38] Digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of figures of merit for various average glandular doses
    Ye-seul Kim
    Hye-Suk Park
    SuJin Park
    Hee-Joung Kim
    Jae-Gu Choi
    Young-Wook Choi
    Jun-Ho Park
    Jae-Jun Lee
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2013, 62 : 1346 - 1353
  • [39] Historical trends in image quality and mean glandular dose in digital mammography
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Khan, Riyad
    Young, Kenneth C.
    15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020), 2020, 11513
  • [40] Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Fusco, Roberta
    Raiano, Nicola
    Raiano, Concetta
    Maio, Francesca
    Vallone, Paolo
    Raso, Mauro Mattace
    Setola, Sergio Venanzio
    Granata, Vincenza
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    Barretta, Maria Lusia
    Petrosino, Teresa
    Petrillo, Antonella
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 126