Digital mammography screening: Average glandular dose and first performance parameters

被引:20
|
作者
Weigel, S.
Girnus, R.
Czwoydzinski, J.
Decker, T.
Spital, S.
Heindel, W.
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, Referenzzentrum Mammografie Screening Einheit, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Gerhard Domagk Inst Pathol, Brust Screening Referenzpathol, Munster, Germany
[4] Screening Einheit Munster Sud Coesfeld, Munster, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; mammography screening; digital mammography; average glandular dose; breast cancer detection rate;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-963387
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Radiation Protection Commission demanded structured implementation of digital mammography screening in Germany. The main requirements were the installation of digital reference centers and separate evaluation of the fully digitized screening units. Digital mammography screening must meet the quality standards of the European guidelines and must be compared to analog screening results. We analyzed early surrogate indicators of effective screening and dosage levels for the first German digital screening unit in a routine setting after the first half of the initial screening round. Materials and Methods: We used three digital mammography screening units (one full-field digital scanner [DR] and two computed radiography systems 1CRI). Each system has been proven to fulfill the requirements of the National and European guidelines. The radiation exposure levels, the medical workflow and the histological results were documented in a central electronic screening record. Results: In the first year 11,413 women were screened (participation rate 57.5%). The parenchymal dosages for the three marnmographic X-ray systems, averaged for the different breast sizes, were 0.7 (DR), 1.3 (CR), 1.5 (CR) mGy. 7% of the screened women needed to undergo further examinations. The total number of screen-detected cancers was 129 (detection rate 1.1 %). 21 % of the carcinomas were classified as ductal carcinomas in situ, 40% of the invasive carcinomas had a histological size <= 10mm and 61 % < 15 mm. The frequency distribution of pTcategories of screen-detected cancer was as follows: pTis 20.9%, pTl 61.2%, pT2 14.7%, pT3 2.3%, pT4 0.8%. 73% of the invasive carcinomas were node-negative. Conclusion: The average glandular dose for all three digital screening units was below the AGD of the analog mammography screening units (1.7 m ' Gy) used in the German trial projects. Nevertheless, the performance indicators of the European guidelines were fulfilled with respect to the prevalent tumor detection rate and tumor size distribution while meeting an acceptable recall rate. This first evaluation of a digital screening unit in Germany demonstrates that the quality standards are met at lower radiation dosage levels than in screen-film mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 895
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimization of image quality and average glandular dose in CR mammography
    Satoh, Kimihiko
    Kuwabara, Takao
    Yasuda, Hiroaki
    Arakawa, Satoshi
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6510
  • [22] Optimizing the anode-filter combination in the sense of image quality and average glandular dose in digital mammography
    Varjonen, Mari
    Stroemmer, Pekka
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
  • [23] Automatic exposure control in digital mammography:: Contrast-to-noise ratio versus average glandular dose
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Golinelli, Paola
    Bellan, Elena
    Colombo, Paola
    D'Ercole, Loredana
    Di Nallo, Anna
    Gallo, Lara
    Giordano, Carlo
    Meliado, Gabriele
    Morri, Barbara
    Nassivera, Elvina
    Oberhofer, Nadia
    Origgi, Daniela
    Paolucci, Massimiliano
    Paruccini, Nicoletta
    Piergentili, Michela
    Rizzi, Elisa
    Rossi, Raffaella
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 711 - +
  • [24] Analysis of influence of digital mammography on the individual average glandular dose against screen-film system
    Azuma, Y.
    Goto, S.
    Sumimoto, T.
    Takeda, Y.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 : 1541 - 1550
  • [25] Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and Radiation Dose Optimization in Screen-Film and Digital X-ray Mammography
    Suliman, Ibrahim I.
    Mohamed, Sawsan
    Mahadi, Alaa
    Bashier, Einas
    Farah, Atifa
    Hassan, Nada
    Ibrahem, Moez A.
    Ali, Mohammed Khalil Mohammed
    Ahmed, Nada A.
    Ma, Chang Ming Charlie
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (21):
  • [26] Optimizing the target-filter combination in digital mammography in the sense of image quality and average glandular dose
    Varjonen, Mari
    Strommer, Pekka
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 570 - 576
  • [27] Mean glandular dose in digital mammography: A dose calculation method comparison
    Suleiman M.E.
    Brennan P.C.
    McEntee M.F.
    Suleiman, Moayyad E. (msul1801@uni.sydney.edu.au), 1600, SPIE (04):
  • [28] Assessment of average glandular dose in mammography practice of a teaching hospital in Ghana
    Kyei, Kofi Adesi
    Anim-Sampong, Samuel
    Ahulu, Eugene Nartey
    Antwi, William Kwadwo
    Daniels, Joseph
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 47
  • [29] Assessment of male patients? average glandular dose during mammography procedure
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
    Salah, Hasan
    Rabbaa, Mohammad
    Abuljoud, Mohammad
    Alkhorayef, M.
    Tahir, Dahlang
    Tamam, N.
    Saeed, Mohammed K.
    Bradley, D. A.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2023, 193
  • [30] Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience
    Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam
    Maheshika Bandara, B. G. U.
    Wickramarathna, S. h dm
    Thenuwara, Hashini
    Satharasinghe, Duminda
    Pallewatte, A. S.
    Hettiarachchi, Pandula
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (03)