Digital mammography screening: Average glandular dose and first performance parameters

被引:20
|
作者
Weigel, S.
Girnus, R.
Czwoydzinski, J.
Decker, T.
Spital, S.
Heindel, W.
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, Referenzzentrum Mammografie Screening Einheit, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Gerhard Domagk Inst Pathol, Brust Screening Referenzpathol, Munster, Germany
[4] Screening Einheit Munster Sud Coesfeld, Munster, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; mammography screening; digital mammography; average glandular dose; breast cancer detection rate;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-963387
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Radiation Protection Commission demanded structured implementation of digital mammography screening in Germany. The main requirements were the installation of digital reference centers and separate evaluation of the fully digitized screening units. Digital mammography screening must meet the quality standards of the European guidelines and must be compared to analog screening results. We analyzed early surrogate indicators of effective screening and dosage levels for the first German digital screening unit in a routine setting after the first half of the initial screening round. Materials and Methods: We used three digital mammography screening units (one full-field digital scanner [DR] and two computed radiography systems 1CRI). Each system has been proven to fulfill the requirements of the National and European guidelines. The radiation exposure levels, the medical workflow and the histological results were documented in a central electronic screening record. Results: In the first year 11,413 women were screened (participation rate 57.5%). The parenchymal dosages for the three marnmographic X-ray systems, averaged for the different breast sizes, were 0.7 (DR), 1.3 (CR), 1.5 (CR) mGy. 7% of the screened women needed to undergo further examinations. The total number of screen-detected cancers was 129 (detection rate 1.1 %). 21 % of the carcinomas were classified as ductal carcinomas in situ, 40% of the invasive carcinomas had a histological size <= 10mm and 61 % < 15 mm. The frequency distribution of pTcategories of screen-detected cancer was as follows: pTis 20.9%, pTl 61.2%, pT2 14.7%, pT3 2.3%, pT4 0.8%. 73% of the invasive carcinomas were node-negative. Conclusion: The average glandular dose for all three digital screening units was below the AGD of the analog mammography screening units (1.7 m ' Gy) used in the German trial projects. Nevertheless, the performance indicators of the European guidelines were fulfilled with respect to the prevalent tumor detection rate and tumor size distribution while meeting an acceptable recall rate. This first evaluation of a digital screening unit in Germany demonstrates that the quality standards are met at lower radiation dosage levels than in screen-film mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 895
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exposure Parameters and Average Glandular Dose in a Digital Mammography System in Japan
    Nishide, Hiroko
    Ohta, Kouji
    Murata, Kaori
    Kodera, Yoshie
    Shimamoto, Kazuhiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2018, 8 (05) : 1030 - 1034
  • [2] Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis
    Olgar, T.
    Kahn, T.
    Gosch, D.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (10): : 911 - 918
  • [3] Average glandular dose with sectra MDM in routine mammography screening
    Hemdal, B
    Hermsdorf, L
    Martin, M
    Andersson, I
    Bengtsson, G
    Heddson, B
    Olsson, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1912 - 1912
  • [4] Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit
    Hemdal, B
    Herrnsdorf, L
    Andersson, I
    Bengtsson, G
    Heddson, B
    Olsson, M
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) : 436 - 443
  • [5] Effect of filter on average glandular dose and image quality in digital mammography
    Songsaeng, C.
    Krisanachinda, A.
    Theerakul, K.
    [J]. 13TH SOUTH-EAST ASIAN CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS 2015 (SEACOMP), 2016, 694
  • [6] Comparison of Anode/Filter Combinations in Digital Mammography with Respect to the Average Glandular Dose
    Uhlenbrock, D. F.
    Mertelmeier, T.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2009, 181 (03): : 249 - 254
  • [7] Average glandular dose with full-field digital mammography - Clinical results
    Hermann, KP
    Kehbel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 502 - 504
  • [8] Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography
    Kawaguchi A.
    Matsunaga Y.
    Otsuka T.
    Suzuki S.
    [J]. Radiological Physics and Technology, 2014, 7 (1) : 102 - 108
  • [9] Patient Specific Average Glandular Dose in Mammography
    Patel, V.
    Highnam, R.
    Tromans, C.
    Pizzutiello, R. J.
    Destounis, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [10] NORMALIZED AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY
    LIU, B
    GOODSITT, M
    CHAN, HP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (01) : 27 - 32