Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and Radiation Dose Optimization in Screen-Film and Digital X-ray Mammography

被引:2
|
作者
Suliman, Ibrahim I. [1 ,2 ]
Mohamed, Sawsan [3 ]
Mahadi, Alaa [3 ]
Bashier, Einas [3 ]
Farah, Atifa [3 ]
Hassan, Nada [3 ]
Ibrahem, Moez A. [2 ]
Ali, Mohammed Khalil Mohammed [2 ]
Ahmed, Nada A. [4 ]
Ma, Chang Ming Charlie
机构
[1] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ IMSIU, Deanship Sci Res, Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
[2] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ IMSIU, Coll Sci, Dept Phys, Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sudan Atom Energy Commiss, Nucl & Radiat Safety Inst, POB 3001, Khartoum, Sudan
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Phys, Madinah 30001, Saudi Arabia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 21期
关键词
X-ray mammography; radiation dose; incident air kerma; diagnostic reference levels (DRLs); compressed breast thickness (CBT); radiation protection; DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; BREAST; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/app132111901
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We determined the average glandular dose (AGD) from the craniocaudally (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views of 496 breasts (247 women) at eight clinics in Sudan. The incident air kerma from the X-ray tube output values and the typical patient-specific breast exposure factors were measured. The AGD values were inferred from the measured incident air kerma and breast-specific dose-conversion coefficients. The AGD per CC and MLO projection and per woman ranged from 0.56 to 2.89 mGy (average: 1.36), 0.48 to 2.08 mGy (average: 1.19), and 2.08 to 9.94 mGy (average: 5.10). The proposed national diagnostic reference levels (mGy) for digital mammography are 1.8 and 1.6 mGy for CC and MLO projection, respectively. Establishing the proposed diagnostic reference levels is an essential step in ensuring patient protection from radiation and will help promote dose optimization for X-ray mammography at the national level and beyond. These results provide important baseline data that can be used to formulate national diagnostic reference levels.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of radiation dose using full field digital and conventional screen-film mammography in a screening clinic
    Gingold, E
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2100 - 2100
  • [12] RECENT TRENDS IN SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY - TECHNICAL FACTORS AND RADIATION-DOSE
    HAUS, AG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (04) : 573 - 573
  • [13] Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis
    Olgar, T.
    Kahn, T.
    Gosch, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (10): : 911 - 918
  • [14] Decreased breast compression using digital mammography at screen/film mean glandular dose
    Kimme-Smith, C
    Yee, TY
    Bassett, LW
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 51 - 55
  • [15] Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography
    Oezdemir, Ayseguel
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (03): : 134 - 139
  • [16] Optimization of image quality and average glandular dose in CR mammography
    Satoh, Kimihiko
    Kuwabara, Takao
    Yasuda, Hiroaki
    Arakawa, Satoshi
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6510
  • [17] OPTIMAL X-RAY-SPECTRA FOR SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    JENNINGS, RJ
    EASTGATE, RJ
    SIEDBAND, MP
    ERGUN, DL
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (05) : 629 - 639
  • [18] SCREEN-FILM VERSUS FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY: RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN A LARGE TEACHING HOSPITAL
    Stantic, Tomislav J.
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera E.
    Stojanovic, Saida S.
    Basta-Nikolic, Marijana D.
    Arandjic, Danijela D.
    Stoiljkovic, Dragana S.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2013, 28 (04): : 398 - 405
  • [19] USE OF HIGH-EFFICIENCY SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMS TO REDUCE RADIATION-DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    SICKLES, EA
    GENANT, HK
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1976, 11 (05) : 422 - 422
  • [20] Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography
    Dimakopoulou, AD
    Tsalafoutas, IA
    Georgiou, EK
    Yakoumakis, EN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 79 (938): : 123 - 129