Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and Radiation Dose Optimization in Screen-Film and Digital X-ray Mammography

被引:2
|
作者
Suliman, Ibrahim I. [1 ,2 ]
Mohamed, Sawsan [3 ]
Mahadi, Alaa [3 ]
Bashier, Einas [3 ]
Farah, Atifa [3 ]
Hassan, Nada [3 ]
Ibrahem, Moez A. [2 ]
Ali, Mohammed Khalil Mohammed [2 ]
Ahmed, Nada A. [4 ]
Ma, Chang Ming Charlie
机构
[1] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ IMSIU, Deanship Sci Res, Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
[2] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ IMSIU, Coll Sci, Dept Phys, Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sudan Atom Energy Commiss, Nucl & Radiat Safety Inst, POB 3001, Khartoum, Sudan
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Phys, Madinah 30001, Saudi Arabia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 21期
关键词
X-ray mammography; radiation dose; incident air kerma; diagnostic reference levels (DRLs); compressed breast thickness (CBT); radiation protection; DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; BREAST; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/app132111901
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We determined the average glandular dose (AGD) from the craniocaudally (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views of 496 breasts (247 women) at eight clinics in Sudan. The incident air kerma from the X-ray tube output values and the typical patient-specific breast exposure factors were measured. The AGD values were inferred from the measured incident air kerma and breast-specific dose-conversion coefficients. The AGD per CC and MLO projection and per woman ranged from 0.56 to 2.89 mGy (average: 1.36), 0.48 to 2.08 mGy (average: 1.19), and 2.08 to 9.94 mGy (average: 5.10). The proposed national diagnostic reference levels (mGy) for digital mammography are 1.8 and 1.6 mGy for CC and MLO projection, respectively. Establishing the proposed diagnostic reference levels is an essential step in ensuring patient protection from radiation and will help promote dose optimization for X-ray mammography at the national level and beyond. These results provide important baseline data that can be used to formulate national diagnostic reference levels.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Average glandular dose with full-field digital mammography - Clinical results
    Hermann, KP
    Kehbel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 502 - 504
  • [32] Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography
    Kawaguchi A.
    Matsunaga Y.
    Otsuka T.
    Suzuki S.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2014, 7 (1) : 102 - 108
  • [33] Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography.
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Grabbe, E
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (11): : 940 - 945
  • [34] Comparison of patient dose and noise with digital and screen-film chest radiographs
    Stone, RM
    Fletcher, G
    Reiker, GG
    Woodard, PK
    Sagel, SS
    Jost, RG
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 689 - 689
  • [35] Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography - Image quality and radiation dose
    Ng, Kwan-Hoong
    Jamal, Noriah
    DeWerd, Larry
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2006, 121 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [36] Reduction of scattered radiation dose by X-ray shielding during mammography
    Koo, Bon-Yeoul
    Lee, Kwang-Sung
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 177
  • [37] Conceptus radiation dose and risk from chest screen-film radiography
    John Damilakis
    Kostas Perisinakis
    Panos Prassopoulos
    Evangelia Dimovasili
    Haralambos Varveris
    Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 406 - 412
  • [38] Conceptus radiation dose and risk from chest screen-film radiography
    Damilakis, J
    Perisinakis, K
    Prassopoulos, P
    Dimovasili, E
    Varveris, H
    Gourtsoyiannis, N
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 406 - 412
  • [39] Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data
    Bouwman, R. W.
    van Engen, R. E.
    Young, K. C.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    Schopphoven, S.
    Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N.
    Veldkamp, W. J. H.
    Dance, D. R.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (20): : 7893 - 7907
  • [40] Average Glandular Dose (AGD) Measurement of GE Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Using a ACR Mammography Accreditation Phantom
    Liang, Y.
    Dutta, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3217 - 3217