Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Tae Yeul [1 ]
Kang, Minhee [2 ,3 ]
Shim, Hyang Jin [4 ]
Kang, On-Kyun [1 ]
Huh, Hee Jae [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Nam Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med & Genet, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Smart Healthcare Res Inst, Biomed Engn Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Med Device Management & Res, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Samsung Med Ctr, Samsung Biomed Res Inst, Ctr Clin Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; bloodstream infections; broth microdilution; Gram-negative; positive blood culture broth; QMAC-dRAST; VITEK; 2; TURNAROUND TIME; VITEK-2; SYSTEM; IDENTIFICATION; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.25043
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioM & eacute;rieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. Methods We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. Results For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. Conclusions The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the Vitek® Reveal™ system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative pathogens, including ESBL, CRE and CRAB, from positive blood cultures
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Cuffari, Sara
    Casciato, Benedetta
    Giani, Tommaso
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [22] Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures
    Ling, TKW
    Liu, ZK
    Cheng, AFB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (10) : 4705 - 4707
  • [23] Saponin promotes rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures with the Vitek 2 system
    Lupetti, A.
    Barnini, S.
    Morici, P.
    Ghelardi, E.
    Nibbering, P. H.
    Campa, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 32 (04) : 493 - 502
  • [24] Saponin promotes rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures with the Vitek 2 system
    A. Lupetti
    S. Barnini
    P. Morici
    E. Ghelardi
    P. H. Nibbering
    M. Campa
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2013, 32 : 493 - 502
  • [25] Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria by the Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System
    Endimiani, A
    Luzzaro, F
    Tamborini, A
    Lombardi, G
    Elia, V
    Belloni, R
    Toniolo, A
    MICROBIOLOGICA, 2002, 25 (03): : 323 - 329
  • [26] Pilot study evaluation of the eQUANTTM system for accelerated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative organisms directly from positive blood cultures
    Abdelhamed, Ayman M.
    Alkins, Brenda R.
    Deak, Eszter
    Rajan, Nitin
    Good, Caryn E.
    Hoyos-Urias, Adrian
    Kimball, Simon R.
    Putney, Suzanne
    Moreno, Angel
    Knopfmacher, Oren
    Banaei, Niaz
    Herget, Meike
    Granato, Paul A.
    Jacobs, Michael R.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2025, 111 (03)
  • [27] Evaluation of VITEK 2 rapid identification and susceptibility testing system against Gram-negative clinical isolates
    Ling, TKW
    Tam, PC
    Liu, ZK
    Cheng, AFB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (08) : 2964 - 2966
  • [28] Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels
    Infante, A.
    de la Tabla, V. Ortiz
    Martin, C.
    Gazquez, G.
    Bunuel, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 40 (01) : 151 - 157
  • [29] Verification of the Vitek Reveal System for Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Gram-Negative Positive Blood Cultures
    Menchinelli, Giulia
    Squitieri, Damiano
    Magri, Carlotta
    De Maio, Flavio
    D'Inzeo, Tiziana
    Cacaci, Margherita
    De Angelis, Giulia
    Sanguinetti, Maurizio
    Posteraro, Brunella
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (11):
  • [30] Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels
    A. Infante
    V. Ortiz de la Tabla
    C. Martín
    G. Gázquez
    F. Buñuel
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2021, 40 : 151 - 157