Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Tae Yeul [1 ]
Kang, Minhee [2 ,3 ]
Shim, Hyang Jin [4 ]
Kang, On-Kyun [1 ]
Huh, Hee Jae [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Nam Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med & Genet, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Smart Healthcare Res Inst, Biomed Engn Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Med Device Management & Res, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Samsung Med Ctr, Samsung Biomed Res Inst, Ctr Clin Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; bloodstream infections; broth microdilution; Gram-negative; positive blood culture broth; QMAC-dRAST; VITEK; 2; TURNAROUND TIME; VITEK-2; SYSTEM; IDENTIFICATION; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.25043
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioM & eacute;rieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. Methods We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. Results For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. Conclusions The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno System for Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures
    Patel, Yera A.
    Kirn, Thomas J.
    Weinstein, Melvin P.
    Uprety, Priyanka
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (03):
  • [32] Performance evaluation of the Specific Reveal system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures containing Gram-negative pathogens
    Ostermann, Greta
    Koerber-Irrgang, Barbara
    Krueger, Alexander
    Singh, Pragya
    Vo, Kenny
    Gielen, Joerg
    Aurbach, Ute
    Wisplinghoff, Hilmar
    Jazmati, Nathalie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (12)
  • [33] Performance of the LifeScale automated rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing on Gram-negative rods directly from positive blood cultures
    Snyder, James W.
    Chaudhry, Nadia
    Hoffmann, Wesley
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (12)
  • [34] EVALUATION OF THE COBASBACT SYSTEM FOR RAPID ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF POSITIVE BLOOD CULTURE BROTHS
    KAMM, W
    BILLE, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1985, 4 (06) : 579 - 582
  • [35] Evaluation of three protocols for direct susceptibility testing for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood culture bottles
    Khan, Salman
    Das, Arghya
    Mishra, Anwita
    Vidyarthi, Ashima Jain
    Nandal, Mukesh
    Yadav, Himanshu
    Roy, Shayak
    Singh, Mahipal
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [36] Evaluation of Quantamatrix dRASTTM system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates from positive blood cultures, in comparison with commercial Micronaut broth microdilution system
    Morecchiato, Fabio
    Coppi, Marco
    Chilleri, Chiara
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Giani, Tommaso
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2024, 110 (01)
  • [37] Evaluation of the BD Phoenix100 System and Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Colistin Against Gram-negative Bacteria
    Koyuncu Ozyurt, Ozlem
    Ozhak, Betil
    Ogunc, Dilara
    Yildiz, Emre
    Colak, Dilek
    Gunseren, Filiz
    Ongut, Gozde
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2019, 53 (03): : 254 - 261
  • [38] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive and -negative bacterial isolates directly from spiked blood culture media with Raman spectroscopy
    Dekter, H. E.
    Orelio, C. C.
    Morsink, M. C.
    Tektas, S.
    Vis, B.
    te Witt, R.
    van Leeuwen, W. B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 36 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [39] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive and -negative bacterial isolates directly from spiked blood culture media with Raman spectroscopy
    H. E. Dekter
    C. C. Orelio
    M. C. Morsink
    S. Tektas
    B. Vis
    R. te Witt
    W. B. van Leeuwen
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2017, 36 : 81 - 89
  • [40] Rapid and cost-effective identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia directly from blood culture fluid
    Sakarikou, Christina
    Altieri, Anna
    Bossa, Maria Cristina
    Minelli, Silvia
    Dolfa, Camilla
    Piperno, Micol
    Favalli, Cartesio
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 146 : 7 - 12