Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Effect of Jaw Tracking in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Thongsawad, Sangutid
    Khamfongkhruea, Chirasak
    Tannanonta, Chirapha
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [3] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [4] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer
    Phurailatpam, Reena
    Wadasadawala, Tabassum
    Chauhan, Kamalnayan
    Panda, Subhajit
    Sarin, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [5] Skin and lung toxicity in synchronous bilateral breast cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy: a mono-institutional experience
    M. Valli
    S. Cima
    D. Gaudino
    R. Cartolari
    L. Deantonio
    M. Frapolli
    D. Daniele
    G. A. Pesce
    F. Martucci
    N. C. Azinwi
    D. Bosetti
    S. Presilla
    A. Richetti
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019, 21 : 1492 - 1498
  • [6] Skin and lung toxicity in synchronous bilateral breast cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy: a mono-institutional experience
    Valli, M.
    Cima, S.
    Gaudino, D.
    Cartolari, R.
    Deantonio, L.
    Frapolli, M.
    Daniele, D.
    Pesce, G. A.
    Martucci, F.
    Azinwi, N. C.
    Bosetti, D.
    Presilla, S.
    Richetti, A.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (11): : 1492 - 1498
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for children with neuroblastoma
    Liu, Xia
    Liu, Zhikai
    Pang, Tingtian
    Dong, Tingting
    Qiu, Jie
    PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION, 2020, 4 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison between interstitial brachytherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for tumor bed boost in breast cancer
    Periasamy, Kannan
    Karunanithi, Gunaseelan
    Cholayil, Shamsudheen
    Dharanipragada, Kadambari
    Neelakanadan, Vijayprabhu
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [9] Dual partial arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy: The game changer for accelerated hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated tumor cavity boost in early breast cancer - A comparative dosimetric study with single partial arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Mondal, Dodul
    Julka, Pramod Kumar
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Laviraj, Macharla Anjaneyelu
    Jana, Manisha
    Kamal, Vineet Kumar
    Deo, Suryanarayan V. S.
    Guleria, Randeep
    Rath, Goura K.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (05) : 1005 - 1010
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for children with neuroblastoma
    Liu Xia
    Liu Zhikai
    Pang Tingtian
    Dong Tingting
    Qiu Jie
    儿科学研究(英文), 2020, 04 (03) : 186 - 191