Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography

被引:14
|
作者
Massera, Rodrigo Trevisan [1 ]
Tomal, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Fis Gleb Wataghin, BR-13083859 Campinas, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Monte Carlo; Mammography; Dosimetry; Skin model; X-RAY-SPECTRA; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; BREAST DOSIMETRY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONVERSION FACTORS; DGN COEFFICIENTS; PHANTOM; VALUES; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify the influence of different skin models on mammographic breast dosimetry, based on dosimetric protocols and recent breast skin thickness findings. Methods: By using an adapted PENELOPE (v. 2014)+ PenEasy (v. 2015) Monte Carlo (MC) code, simulations were performed in order to obtain the mean glandular dose (MGD), the normalized MGD by incident air Kerma (DgN), and the glandular depth dose (GDD(z)). The geometry was based on a cranio-caudal mammographic examination. Monoenergetic and polyenergetic beams were implemented, for a breast thickness from 2 cm to 9 cm, with different compositions. Seven skin models were used: a 5mm adipose layer; a skin layer ranging from 5mm to 1.45 mm, a 1.45mm skin thickness with a subcutaneous adipose layer of 2mm and 3.55 mm. Results: The differences, for monoenergetic beams, are higher (up to 200%) for lower energies (8 keV), thicker and low glandular content breasts, decreasing to less than 5% at 40 keV. Without a skin layer, the differences reach a maximum of 1240%. The relative difference in DgN values for 1.45mm skin and 5mm adipose layers and polyenergetic beams varies from -14% to 12%. Conclusions: The implemented MC code is suitable for mammography dosimetry calculations. The skin models have major impacts on MGD values, and the results complement previous literature findings. The current protocols should be updated to include a more realistic skin model, which provides a reliable breast dose estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimation of Mean Glandular Dose for Patients Who Undergo Mammography and Studying the Factors Affecting it
    Barzanje, Sana L. N. H.
    Harki, Edrees M. Tahir Nury
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOPS ON BASIC AND APPLIES SCIENCES, 2017, 1888
  • [32] Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography
    Nassar, Joyce
    Rizk, Chadia
    Fares, Georges
    Tohme, Carla
    Braidy, Chady
    Farah, Jad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [33] Determination of mean glandular dose from routine mammography for two age groups of patients
    Kunosic, Suad
    Ceke, Denis
    Kopric, Mustafa
    Lincender, Lidija
    [J]. HEALTHMED, 2010, 4 (01): : 125 - 131
  • [34] Monte Carlo Methods for Assessment of the Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Simulations in Homogeneous Phantoms
    Tucciariello, R. M.
    Barca, P.
    Caramella, D.
    Lamastra, R.
    Traino, C.
    Fantacci, M. E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 3 (BIOINFORMATICS), 2019, : 242 - 249
  • [35] Decreased breast compression using digital mammography at screen/film mean glandular dose
    Kimme-Smith, C
    Yee, TY
    Bassett, LW
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 51 - 55
  • [36] Evaluation of depth dose and glandular dose for digital mammography
    Tsai, H. Y.
    Chong, N. S.
    Ho, Y. J.
    Tyan, Y. S.
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2010, 45 (3-6) : 726 - 728
  • [37] Image Quality and Mean Glandular Dose in Mexican Mammography Services Measured with an Object-Insert/TL Mammography Kit
    Lopez-Pineda, Eduardo
    Ruiz-Trejo, Cesar
    Brandan, Maria-Ester
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS: Fourteenth Mexican Symposium on Medical Physics, 2016, 1747
  • [38] MAMMOGRAPHY RADIATION DOSE: INITIAL RESULTS FROM SERBIA BASED ON MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE ASSESSMENT FOR PHANTOMS AND PATIENTS
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
    Beciric, Snezana
    Arandjic, Danijela
    Kosutic, Dusko
    Kovacevic, Milojko
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 140 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [39] Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol
    Dance, DR
    Skinner, CL
    Young, KC
    Beckett, JR
    Kotre, CJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11): : 3225 - 3240
  • [40] EVALUATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE IN A FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UNIT IN TABRIZ, IRAN
    Riabi, Hamed Alizadeh
    Mehnati, Parinaz
    Mesbahi, Asghar
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 142 (2-4) : 222 - 227