Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia
    Grimer, RJ
    Carter, SR
    Tillman, RM
    Sneath, RS
    Walker, PS
    Unwin, PS
    Shewell, PC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (03): : 488 - 494
  • [2] Predicting length of stay after proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for oncological conditions
    Kapoor, Smriti
    Singh, Saurabh
    Bassett, Paul
    Gerrand, Craig
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (05): : E236 - E240
  • [3] Modular endoprosthetic replacement for proximal tibia tumor patients
    Vyrva, O. Ye
    Skoryk, I. O.
    Tovazhnianska, V. D.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (02) : 242 - 249
  • [4] Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after proximal tibia endoprosthetic replacement
    Bickels, J
    Wittig, JC
    Kollender, Y
    Neff, RS
    Kellar-Graney, K
    Meller, I
    Malawer, MM
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (07): : 856 - 862
  • [5] The long-term results of endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone tumours
    Myers, G. J. C.
    Abudu, A. T.
    Carter, S. R.
    Tillman, R. M.
    Grimer, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (12): : 1632 - 1637
  • [6] ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS
    ROSS, AC
    WILSON, JN
    SCALES, JT
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (04): : 656 - 661
  • [7] Total endoprosthetic replacement of femur, humerus and tibia
    Lenze, U.
    Knebel, C.
    Lenze, F.
    Consalvo, S.
    Lazic, I
    Breden, S.
    Rechl, H.
    von Eisenhart-Rothe, R.
    ORTHOPADE, 2019, 48 (07): : 555 - 562
  • [8] Femoral bone growth after extendible endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia in skeletally immature patients
    Idowu, Oluwaseyi Kayode
    Babalola, Oladimeji Ranti
    Abudu, Adesegun Tibramiyu
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2021, 87 (03): : 443 - 448
  • [9] Use of hamstring autograft to reconstruct the patellar tendon after endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone sarcomas
    Madi, Naji S.
    Masrouha, Karim Z.
    Haidar, Rachid K.
    Saghieh, Said S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2020, 29 (05): : 510 - 513
  • [10] Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur
    Chandrasekar, C. R.
    Grimer, R. J.
    Carter, S. R.
    Tillman, R. M.
    Abudu, A.
    Buckley, L.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (01): : 108 - 112