Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of Endoprosthetic Replacement in Old Patients with Isolated Proximal Femoral Bone Metastases
    Peng Liu
    Zhuan Wang
    Shiyuan Zhang
    Guoqiang Ding
    Ke Tan
    Ji Zhou
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 8623 - 8630
  • [42] Modular endoprosthetic replacement for failed internal fixation of the proximal femur following trauma
    Dean, Benjamin John Floyd
    Matthews, Jon J.
    Price, Andrew
    Stubbs, David
    Whitwell, Duncan
    Gibbons, Christopher M. L. H.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (04) : 731 - 734
  • [43] Surgical strategy for benign lesions in proximal femur: internal fixation or endoprosthetic replacement
    Hongyuan Liu
    Xiang Fang
    Zeping Yu
    Yun Lang
    Yan Xiong
    Hong Duan
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2691 - 2698
  • [44] Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour THE RISK OF REVISION IN YOUNG PATIENTS
    Chandrasekar, C. R.
    Grimer, R. J.
    Carter, S. R.
    Tillman, R. M.
    Abudu, A.
    Jeys, L. M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (03): : 401 - 404
  • [45] Endoprothetischer Totalersatz von Femur, Humerus und TibiaTotal endoprosthetic replacement of femur, humerus and tibia
    U. Lenze
    C. Knebel
    F. Lenze
    S. Consalvo
    I. Lazic
    S. Breden
    H. Rechl
    R. von Eisenhart-Rothe
    Der Orthopäde, 2019, 48 : 555 - 562
  • [46] Insertion of the patella tendon after prosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia
    Ozaki, T
    Kunisada, T
    Kawai, A
    Takahara, Y
    Inoue, H
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 70 (05): : 527 - 529
  • [47] Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement to transfemoral amputee as a practical treatment option: A case report
    Tsuda, Yusuke
    Okuma, Tomotake
    Imanishi, Jungo
    Hozumi, Takahiro
    Goto, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2021, 26 (02) : 315 - 318
  • [48] A new technique of endoprosthetic replacement for osteosarcoma of proximal femur with intra-articular extension
    Oragui, E.
    Nannaparaju, M.
    Sri-Ram, K.
    Khan, W.
    Hashemi-Nejad, A.
    Skinner, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2013, 4 (01): : 101 - 104
  • [49] Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement for Salvage of Failed Fixation of Malignant Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures
    Johnson, Joshua D.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (04): : 700 - 703
  • [50] Clinical and functional comparison of endoprosthetic replacement with intramedullary nailing for treating proximal femur metastasis
    Hua Gao
    Zhenyu Liu
    Baojun Wang
    Ai Guo
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2016, 28 (02) : 209 - 214