Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AND ACETABULUM - A SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
    DOBBS, HS
    SCALES, JT
    WILSON, JN
    KEMP, HBS
    BURROWS, HJ
    SNEATH, RS
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1981, 63 (02): : 219 - 224
  • [22] Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur
    Kabukcuoglu, Y
    Grimer, RJ
    Tillman, RM
    Carter, SR
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1999, (358) : 8 - 14
  • [23] Is endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur appropriate in the comorbid patient?
    Khajuria, Arun
    Ward, Jonathon
    Cooper, George
    Stevenson, Jonathon
    Parry, Michael
    Jeys, Lee
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [24] Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for aggressive bone tumours
    Abudu, A
    Grimer, RJ
    Tillman, RM
    Carter, SR
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1999, 23 (05) : 291 - 294
  • [25] Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for aggressive bone tumours
    A. Abudu
    R. J Grimer
    R. M. Tillman
    S. R. Carter
    International Orthopaedics, 1999, 23 : 291 - 294
  • [26] CORR InsightsA®: Proximal Tibia Reconstruction After Bone Tumor Resection: Are Survivorship and Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement and Osteoarticular Allograft Similar?
    Campanacci, Domenico Andrea
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (03) : 683 - 685
  • [27] REFIXATION OF MUSCULAR INSERTIONS AFTER ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS
    RITSCHL, P
    PIZAKATZER, H
    PECHMANN, U
    KOTZ, R
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1989, 108 (06) : 386 - 389
  • [28] Proximal ulna endoprosthetic replacement for bone tumours in young patients
    Mathew D. Sewell
    Sammy A. Hanna
    Rob C. Pollock
    William J. Aston
    John A. Skinner
    Gordon W. Blunn
    Stephen R. Cannon
    Timothy W. R. Briggs
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 1039 - 1044
  • [29] Proximal ulna endoprosthetic replacement for bone tumours in young patients
    Sewell, Mathew D.
    Hanna, Sammy A.
    Pollock, Rob C.
    Aston, William J.
    Skinner, John A.
    Blunn, Gordon W.
    Cannon, Stephen R.
    Briggs, Timothy W. R.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (05) : 1039 - 1044
  • [30] Cemented endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic bone disease in the proximal femur
    Selek, Hakan
    Basarir, Kerem
    Yildiz, Yusuf
    Saglik, Yener
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (01): : 112 - 117