Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus - Long-term results
    Kumar, D
    Grimer, RJ
    Abudu, A
    Carter, SR
    Tillman, RM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (05): : 717 - 722
  • [32] Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: Metastatic versus primary tumors
    Potter, Benjamin K.
    Chow, Vincent E.
    Adams, Sheila C.
    Letson, G. Douglas
    Temple, H. Thomas
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2009, 18 (04): : 343 - 349
  • [33] Malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia: Endoprosthetic replacement or rotationplasty - Functional outcome and quality-of-life measurements
    Hillman, A
    Hoffmann, C
    Gosheger, G
    Krakau, H
    Winkelmann, W
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04): : 462 - 468
  • [34] Tibia Multiplanar Deformities and Growth Disturbance Following Expandable Endoprosthetic Distal Femur Replacement
    Shehadeh, Ahmad
    Al-Qawasmi, Muhamad
    Al Btoush, Omar
    Obeid, Zeinab
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (22)
  • [35] TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT FOR METASTATIC DESTRUCTION OF THE PROXIMAL TIBIA
    TILLMAN, RM
    SMITH, RB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (03): : 516 - 517
  • [36] REPLACEMENT OF THE DISTAL FEMUR AND PROXIMAL TIBIA WITH FROZEN ALLOGRAFTS
    ZATSEPIN, ST
    BURDYGIN, VN
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1994, (303) : 95 - 102
  • [37] Application of Endoprosthetic Replacement in Old Patients with Isolated Proximal Femoral Bone Metastases
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Zhuan
    Zhang, Shiyuan
    Ding, Guoqiang
    Tan, Ke
    Zhou, Ji
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (13) : 8623 - 8630
  • [38] Modular endoprosthetic replacement for failed internal fixation of the proximal femur following trauma
    Benjamin John Floyd Dean
    Jon J. Matthews
    Andrew Price
    David Stubbs
    Duncan Whitwell
    Christopher M. L. H. Gibbons
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 731 - 734
  • [39] Surgical strategy for benign lesions in proximal femur: internal fixation or endoprosthetic replacement
    Liu, Hongyuan
    Fang, Xiang
    Yu, Zeping
    Lang, Yun
    Xiong, Yan
    Duan, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (11) : 2691 - 2698
  • [40] METASTATIC INSTABILITY AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FEMUR - COMPARISON OF ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT AND PLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS
    ROMPE, JD
    EYSEL, P
    HOPF, C
    HEINE, J
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1994, 113 (05) : 260 - 264