Breast Reconstruction following Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends

被引:270
|
作者
Colwell, Amy S. [1 ]
Tessler, Oren [1 ]
Lin, Alex M. [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Winograd, Jonathan [1 ]
Cetrulo, Curtis L. [1 ]
Tang, Rong [1 ]
Smith, Barbara L. [1 ]
Austen, William G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; ENVELOPE MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; AREOLA COMPLEX; PRESERVATION; CANCER; RISK; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly used for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Few data exist on risk factors for complications and reconstruction outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2012. Results: Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent 500 nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures for breast cancer (46 percent) or risk reduction (54 percent). The average body mass index was 24, and 6 percent were smokers. The mean follow-up was 2.17 years. Immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction rate, 98.8 percent) was performed with direct-to-implant (59 percent), tissue expander/implant (38 percent), or autologous (2 percent) reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 71 percent and mesh was used in 11 percent. Seventy-seven reconstructions had radiotherapy. Complications included infection (3.3 percent), skin necrosis (5.2 percent), nipple necrosis (4.4 percent), seroma (1.7 percent), hematoma (1.7 percent), and implant loss (1.9 percent). Positive predictors for total complications included smoking (OR, 3.3; 95 percent CI, 1.289 to 8.486) and periareolar incisions (OR, 3.63; 95 percent CI, 1.850 to 7.107). Increasing body mass index predicted skin necrosis (OR, 1.154; 95 percent CI, 1.036 to 1.286) and preoperative irradiation predicted nipple necrosis (OR, 4.86; 95 percent CI, 1.0197 to 23.169). An inframammary fold incision decreased complications (OR, 0.018; 95 percent CI, 0.0026 to 0.12089). Five-year trends showed increasing numbers of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and more single-stage versus two-stage reconstructions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstructions have a low number of complications. Smoking, body mass index, preoperative irradiation, and incision type were predictors of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Breast Reconstruction Outcomes after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Radiation Therapy
    Reish, Richard G.
    Lin, Alex
    Phillips, Nicole A.
    Winograd, Jonathan
    Liao, Eric C.
    Cetrulo, Curtis L., Jr.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Colwell, Amy S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (04) : 959 - 966
  • [12] Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Choi, Mihye
    Frey, Jordan D.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2020, 40 : S13 - S21
  • [13] Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction in the Irradiated Breast
    Spear, Scott L.
    Shuck, John
    Hannan, Lindsay
    Albino, Frank
    Patel, Ketan M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (05) : 605E - 614E
  • [14] 5.year follow up of nipple areolar sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer
    Kang, S. H.
    Lee, S. J.
    Baek, N. W.
    Kim, E. M.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 211 - 211
  • [15] Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Sbitany, Hani
    Piper, Merisa
    Lentz, Rachel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (03) : 432 - 443
  • [16] Nipple Sparing Mastectomy with Primary Breast Reconstruction - Local Recurrence and Complications in 246 Cases
    Selakovic, V.
    Golubovic, A.
    Ranisavljevic, M.
    Plzak, A.
    Radovanovic, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S193 - S193
  • [17] Invited Response: Expander-Based and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy
    Riggio, Egidio
    Alfieri, Sara
    Borreani, Claudia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (SUPPL 1) : 151 - 153
  • [18] Invited Response: Expander-Based and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy
    Egidio Riggio
    Sara Alfieri
    Claudia Borreani
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 151 - 153
  • [19] Recipient Vessel Selection in Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Free Abdominal Tissue Transfer after Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy
    Yang, Sung Jun
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Lee, Taik Jong
    Ahn, Sei Hyun
    Son, Byung Ho
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2012, 39 (03): : 216 - 221
  • [20] Nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction after areola-sparing mastectomy
    Opsomer, Dries
    Vyncke, Tom
    Depypere, Bernard
    Stillaert, Filip
    Van Landuyt, Koenraad
    Blondeel, Phillip
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06): : 1223 - 1228