Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

被引:227
|
作者
Sbitany, Hani [1 ]
Piper, Merisa [1 ]
Lentz, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; EXPANDER-IMPLANT EXCHANGE; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; RADIATION-THERAPY; DIFFERENT TIMINGS; CAPSULE FORMATION; OUTCOMES; COVERAGE; RADIOTHERAPY; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003627
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction is routinely performed because of excellent aesthetic results and safe oncologic outcomes. Typically, subpectoral expanders are placed, but in select patients, this can lead to significant postoperative pain and animation deformity, caused by pectoralis major muscle disinsertion and stretch. Prepectoral reconstruction is a technique that eliminates dissection of the pectoralis major by placing the prosthesis completely above the muscle with complete acellular dermal matrix coverage. Methods: A single surgeon's experience with immediate prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy from 2012 to 2016 was reviewed. Patient demographics, adjuvant treatment, length and characteristics of the expansion, and incidence of complications during the tissue expander stage were compared between the partial submuscular/partial acellular dermal matrix (dual-plane) cohort and the prepectoral cohort. Results: Fifty-one patients (84 breasts) underwent immediate prepectoral tissue expander placement, compared with 115 patients (186 breasts) undergoing immediate partial submuscular expander placement. The groups had similar comorbidities and postoperative radiation exposure. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate between the two groups (17.9 percent versus 18.8 percent; p = 0.49). Conclusions: Prepectoral breast reconstruction provides a safe and effective alternative to partial submuscular reconstruction, that yields comparable aesthetic results with less operative morbidity. In the authors' experience, the incidence of acute and chronic postoperative pain and animation deformity is significantly lower following prepectoral breast reconstruction. This technique is now considered for all patients who are safe oncologic candidates and are undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy and prosthetic reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 443
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discussion: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Gabriel, Allen
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (03) : 444 - 446
  • [2] Immediate prepectoral versus submuscular breast reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis
    Cavalcante, Francisco Pimentel
    Lima, Ticiane Oliveira
    Alcantara, Ryane
    Cardoso, Amanda
    Novita, Guilherme
    Zerwes, Felipe
    Millen, Eduardo
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2024, 46
  • [3] Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Mastopexy
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Arif, Chaudhry
    Banuelos, Joseph
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Martinez-Jorge, Jorys
    Tran, Nho, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [4] ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Reconstruction: Postoperative Complications
    Larson, Kelsey E.
    Braun, Sterling
    Butterworth, James A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (Suppl 3) : 703 - 704
  • [5] ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Reconstruction: Postoperative Complications
    Kelsey E. Larson
    Sterling Braun
    James A. Butterworth
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 703 - 704
  • [6] Safety of Incision Placement with Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Holland, Michael
    Wallace, Adam
    Viner, Jennifer
    Sbitany, Hani
    Piper, Merisa
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (01) : E4736
  • [7] Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Moon, Jiae
    Lee, Jeea
    Lee, Dong Won
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Nam, Da Jung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Na Young
    Park, Hyung Seok
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (11): : 2409 - 2416
  • [8] A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Caroline A. King
    Alex J. Bartholomew
    Michael Sosin
    Azalia Avila
    Amber L. Famiglietti
    Paige K. Dekker
    Idanis M. Perez-Alvarez
    David H. Song
    Kenneth L. Fan
    Eleni A. Tousimis
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 9150 - 9158
  • [9] Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Tanna, Neil
    Broer, P. Niclas
    Weichman, Katie E.
    Alperovich, Michael
    Ahn, Christina Y.
    Allen, Robert J., Sr.
    Choi, Mihye
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Saadeh, Pierre B.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (02) : 139E - 147E
  • [10] Is nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction for breast cancer safe and worthwhile?
    Regis, C.
    Mesdag, V.
    Tresch, E.
    Chauvet, M. P.
    Boulanger, L.
    Collinet, P.
    Giard, S.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76