Breast Reconstruction following Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends

被引:270
|
作者
Colwell, Amy S. [1 ]
Tessler, Oren [1 ]
Lin, Alex M. [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Winograd, Jonathan [1 ]
Cetrulo, Curtis L. [1 ]
Tang, Rong [1 ]
Smith, Barbara L. [1 ]
Austen, William G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; ENVELOPE MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; AREOLA COMPLEX; PRESERVATION; CANCER; RISK; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly used for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Few data exist on risk factors for complications and reconstruction outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2012. Results: Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent 500 nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures for breast cancer (46 percent) or risk reduction (54 percent). The average body mass index was 24, and 6 percent were smokers. The mean follow-up was 2.17 years. Immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction rate, 98.8 percent) was performed with direct-to-implant (59 percent), tissue expander/implant (38 percent), or autologous (2 percent) reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 71 percent and mesh was used in 11 percent. Seventy-seven reconstructions had radiotherapy. Complications included infection (3.3 percent), skin necrosis (5.2 percent), nipple necrosis (4.4 percent), seroma (1.7 percent), hematoma (1.7 percent), and implant loss (1.9 percent). Positive predictors for total complications included smoking (OR, 3.3; 95 percent CI, 1.289 to 8.486) and periareolar incisions (OR, 3.63; 95 percent CI, 1.850 to 7.107). Increasing body mass index predicted skin necrosis (OR, 1.154; 95 percent CI, 1.036 to 1.286) and preoperative irradiation predicted nipple necrosis (OR, 4.86; 95 percent CI, 1.0197 to 23.169). An inframammary fold incision decreased complications (OR, 0.018; 95 percent CI, 0.0026 to 0.12089). Five-year trends showed increasing numbers of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and more single-stage versus two-stage reconstructions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstructions have a low number of complications. Smoking, body mass index, preoperative irradiation, and incision type were predictors of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complications and patient satisfaction following unilateral immediate expander breast reconstruction after nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy
    Zubor, P.
    Homola, I.
    Kulkovska, T.
    Vlcakova, D.
    Biringer, K.
    Laucekova, Z.
    Simova, D.
    Kozubik, E.
    Stastny, I.
    Kudela, E.
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : S121 - S121
  • [22] A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Caroline A. King
    Alex J. Bartholomew
    Michael Sosin
    Azalia Avila
    Amber L. Famiglietti
    Paige K. Dekker
    Idanis M. Perez-Alvarez
    David H. Song
    Kenneth L. Fan
    Eleni A. Tousimis
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 9150 - 9158
  • [23] A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    King, Caroline A.
    Bartholomew, Alex J.
    Sosin, Michael
    Avila, Azalia
    Famiglietti, Amber L.
    Dekker, Paige K.
    Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M.
    Song, David H.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Tousimis, Eleni A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (13) : 9150 - 9158
  • [24] Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) and Immediate Reconstruction
    Chidester, J. R.
    Olson, J. R.
    Poruk, K. E.
    Marengo, J. J.
    Matsen, C. B.
    Neumayer, L.
    Agarwal, J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [25] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [26] Nipple sparing mastectomy and the evolving direct to implant breast reconstruction
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon Leifur
    Heidemann, Lene Nyhoj
    Bille, Camilla
    Sorensen, Jens Ahm
    Thomsen, Jorn Bo
    GLAND SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 267 - 272
  • [27] Initial oncological outcomes of nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer with nipple discharge
    Hong Hou
    Jing Xia
    Lin Tan
    Yue Yu
    Xin Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 23 (1)
  • [28] Nipple sparing mastectomy and microsurgical breast reconstruction: An approach for success
    Knackstedt, Rebecca
    Hashem, Ahmed M.
    Schwarz, Graham S.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (04): : 609 - 611
  • [29] "Autologous Breast Dermal Filler": A Novel Technique for Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Pubertal Gigantomastia
    Ma, Xiaomu
    Xu, Boyang
    Liu, Wenyue
    Li, Shangshan
    Liu, Chunjun
    Luan, Jie
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 49 (01) : 205 - 210
  • [30] One-Stage Nipple and Breast Reconstruction Following Areola-Sparing Mastectomy
    Kim, Hye Ri
    Lim, Jin Soo
    Kim, Sue Min
    Jung, Sung No
    Yoo, Gyeol
    Rha, Eun Young
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2013, 40 (05): : 553 - 558