Breast Reconstruction following Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends

被引:270
|
作者
Colwell, Amy S. [1 ]
Tessler, Oren [1 ]
Lin, Alex M. [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Winograd, Jonathan [1 ]
Cetrulo, Curtis L. [1 ]
Tang, Rong [1 ]
Smith, Barbara L. [1 ]
Austen, William G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; ENVELOPE MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; AREOLA COMPLEX; PRESERVATION; CANCER; RISK; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly used for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Few data exist on risk factors for complications and reconstruction outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2012. Results: Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent 500 nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures for breast cancer (46 percent) or risk reduction (54 percent). The average body mass index was 24, and 6 percent were smokers. The mean follow-up was 2.17 years. Immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction rate, 98.8 percent) was performed with direct-to-implant (59 percent), tissue expander/implant (38 percent), or autologous (2 percent) reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 71 percent and mesh was used in 11 percent. Seventy-seven reconstructions had radiotherapy. Complications included infection (3.3 percent), skin necrosis (5.2 percent), nipple necrosis (4.4 percent), seroma (1.7 percent), hematoma (1.7 percent), and implant loss (1.9 percent). Positive predictors for total complications included smoking (OR, 3.3; 95 percent CI, 1.289 to 8.486) and periareolar incisions (OR, 3.63; 95 percent CI, 1.850 to 7.107). Increasing body mass index predicted skin necrosis (OR, 1.154; 95 percent CI, 1.036 to 1.286) and preoperative irradiation predicted nipple necrosis (OR, 4.86; 95 percent CI, 1.0197 to 23.169). An inframammary fold incision decreased complications (OR, 0.018; 95 percent CI, 0.0026 to 0.12089). Five-year trends showed increasing numbers of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and more single-stage versus two-stage reconstructions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstructions have a low number of complications. Smoking, body mass index, preoperative irradiation, and incision type were predictors of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Explantation following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Goldilocks Approach to Traditional Breast Reconstruction
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Bamba, Ravinder
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (04) : 795E - 796E
  • [32] Promising Oncological and Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Nipple- or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
    Ozkurt, Enver
    Tukenmez, Mustafa
    Ozden, Burcu C.
    Oner, Gizem
    Guven, Erdem
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    Igci, Abdullah
    Ozmen, Vahit
    Kucucuk, Seden
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : 85 - 85
  • [33] Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Critical Appraisal of Five Year, Single Centre Outcomes.
    Westbroek, D.
    Karat, I.
    Min-Hui, H.
    Gukas, I.
    Daoud, R.
    Laidlaw, I. J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [34] Breast Reconstruction Using a Staged Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy following Mastopexy or Reduction
    Spear, Scott L.
    Rottman, Steven J.
    Seiboth, Laura A.
    Hannan, Catherine M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (03) : 572 - 581
  • [35] Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction
    Bailey, Christopher R.
    Ogbuagu, Onyebuchi
    Baltodano, Pablo A.
    Simjee, Usamah F.
    Manahan, Michele A.
    Cooney, Damon S.
    Jacobs, Lisa K.
    Tsangaris, Theodore N.
    Cooney, Carisa M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (02) : 219 - 226
  • [36] Does nipple sparing mastectomy affect the postoperative complication rate after breast reconstruction? Comparison of postoperative complications after nipple sparing mastectomy vs skin sparing mastectomy
    Kracoff, Sharon
    Benkler, Michal
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Ben-Baruch, Noa
    Egozi, Dana
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (04): : 755 - 756
  • [37] Aesthetics and patient-reported outcomes following microsurgical breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Duraes, Eliana F. R.
    Durand, Paul
    Morisda, Megan
    Baker, Todd A.
    Rueda, Steven
    Djohan, Risal
    Moreira, Andrea
    Bernard, Steven
    de Sousa, Joao Batista
    Schwarz, Graham S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (04) : E49 - E49
  • [38] Discussion: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Gabriel, Allen
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (03) : 444 - 446
  • [39] Minimizing Nipple-Areolar Complex Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Perez-Otero, Sofia
    Hemal, Kshipra
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Kabir, Raeesa
    Sorenson, Thomas J.
    Jacobson, Alexis
    Thanik, Vishal D.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Cohen, Oriana D.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (4S) : S179 - S184
  • [40] Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Avila, Azalia
    Bartholomew, Alex J.
    Sosin, Michael
    Deldar, Romina
    Griffith, Kayla F.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Song, David H.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Tousimis, Eleni A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (06) : 715E - 720E