Breast Reconstruction following Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends

被引:270
|
作者
Colwell, Amy S. [1 ]
Tessler, Oren [1 ]
Lin, Alex M. [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Winograd, Jonathan [1 ]
Cetrulo, Curtis L. [1 ]
Tang, Rong [1 ]
Smith, Barbara L. [1 ]
Austen, William G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; ENVELOPE MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; AREOLA COMPLEX; PRESERVATION; CANCER; RISK; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly used for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Few data exist on risk factors for complications and reconstruction outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2012. Results: Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent 500 nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures for breast cancer (46 percent) or risk reduction (54 percent). The average body mass index was 24, and 6 percent were smokers. The mean follow-up was 2.17 years. Immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction rate, 98.8 percent) was performed with direct-to-implant (59 percent), tissue expander/implant (38 percent), or autologous (2 percent) reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 71 percent and mesh was used in 11 percent. Seventy-seven reconstructions had radiotherapy. Complications included infection (3.3 percent), skin necrosis (5.2 percent), nipple necrosis (4.4 percent), seroma (1.7 percent), hematoma (1.7 percent), and implant loss (1.9 percent). Positive predictors for total complications included smoking (OR, 3.3; 95 percent CI, 1.289 to 8.486) and periareolar incisions (OR, 3.63; 95 percent CI, 1.850 to 7.107). Increasing body mass index predicted skin necrosis (OR, 1.154; 95 percent CI, 1.036 to 1.286) and preoperative irradiation predicted nipple necrosis (OR, 4.86; 95 percent CI, 1.0197 to 23.169). An inframammary fold incision decreased complications (OR, 0.018; 95 percent CI, 0.0026 to 0.12089). Five-year trends showed increasing numbers of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and more single-stage versus two-stage reconstructions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstructions have a low number of complications. Smoking, body mass index, preoperative irradiation, and incision type were predictors of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aesthetic Incisions and Early Complications for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Cavalcante, Francisco Pimentel
    Novita, Guilherme
    Lima, Ticiane Oliveira
    Alcantara, Ryane
    Cardoso, Amanda
    Ulisses, Flora
    Zerwes, Felipe
    Millen, Eduardo
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [42] Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Complications in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Idris, Omer A.
    Ahmedfiqi, Yaqub O.
    Shebrain, Abdulaziz
    Al-Assil, Talal
    Pacione, Sabrina C.
    Haj, Delour
    Motan, Abdelrahman D.
    Momani, Faroog
    Bzizi, Hanin
    Jahromi, Bahar Saadaie
    Lewis, Ramona Meraz
    Steeg, Kyle Ver
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [43] Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
    Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor
    Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung
    Yoon, Kyung-Hwak
    Myung, Yujin
    Koh, Hyoung Won
    Lee, Ok Hee
    Hoon, Jeong Jae
    Shin, Hee Chul
    Kim, Eun-Kyu
    Heo, Chan Yeong
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [44] Quality of Life and Complications after Nipple- versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Clarijs, Marloes E.
    Peeters, Noelle J. M. C. Vrancken
    van Dongen, Sophie A. F.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Rijken, Bianca F. M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (01) : 12E - 24E
  • [45] Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up
    Ozkurt, Enver
    Tukenmez, Mustafa
    Guven, Erdem
    Ozden, Burcu Celet
    Oner, Gizem
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    Igci, Abdullah
    Ozmen, Vahit
    Kucucuk, Seden
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [46] Patient Satisfaction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Outcome Study
    Djohan, Risal
    Gage, Earl
    Gatherwright, James
    Pavri, Sabrina
    Firouz, Jimmy
    Bernard, Steven
    Yetman, Randall
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (03) : 818 - 829
  • [47] Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Mastectomy Flap Ischemia following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Lotfi, Philip
    Dayan, Joseph
    Chiu, Ernest S.
    Mehrara, Babak
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (06) : 1114E - 1115E
  • [48] Analysis of patient-reported outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant reconstruction
    Pharmer, L. A.
    Koslow, S. B.
    Martins, D.
    Theodore, R.
    Christos, P. J.
    Talmor, M.
    Simmons, R. M.
    Tousimis, E.
    Swistel, A. J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [49] Breast Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with Pooled Analysis
    Endara, Matthew
    Chen, Duan
    Verma, Kapil
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    Spear, Scott L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (05) : 1043 - 1054
  • [50] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Christensen, Joani M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (05) : 44S - 50S