2D and 3D Roughness Characterization

被引:79
|
作者
Magsipoc, Earl [1 ]
Zhao, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Grasselli, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Roughness characterization; Rock joint roughness; Aperture; Joint shear strength; Fractal roughness; Synthetic roughness; PEAK SHEAR-STRENGTH; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; ROCK JOINTS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; NATURAL FRACTURE; COEFFICIENT JRC; FLUID-FLOW; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-019-01977-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The quantification of surface roughness for the purpose of linking its effect to mechanical and hydrodynamic behavior has taken many different forms. In this paper, we present a thorough review of commonly used 2D and 3D surface roughness characterization methods, categorized as statistical, fractal, and directional. Statistical methods are further subdivided into parametric and functional methods that yield a single value and function to evaluate roughness, respectively. These statistical roughness metrics are useful as their resultant outputs can be used in estimating shear and flow behavior in fractures. Fractal characterization methods treat rough surfaces and profiles as fractal objects to provide parameters that characterize roughness at different scales. The directional characterization method encompasses an approach more closely linked to shear strength and is more suitable for estimating the influence of fracture roughness on mechanical responses. Overall, roughness characterization methods provide an effective objective measure of surface texture that describe its influence on the mechanics of surfaces without requiring qualitative description.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1519
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Earl Magsipoc
    Qi Zhao
    Giovanni Grasselli
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1495 - 1519
  • [2] 2D and 3D photoresist line roughness characterization
    Pret, Alessandro Vaglio
    Kunnen, Eddy
    Gronheid, Roel
    Pargon, Erwine
    Luere, Olivier
    Bianchi, Davide
    [J]. MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 110 : 100 - 107
  • [3] Modeling the Effect of Roughness on Ultrasonic Scattering in 2D and 3D
    Cegla, Frederic
    Jarvis, Andrew
    [J]. 40TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: INCORPORATING THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BARKHAUSEN NOISE AND MICROMAGNETIC TESTING, VOLS 33A & 33B, 2014, 1581 : 595 - 601
  • [4] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [5] Proposal of a Correlation Function between 2D and 3D Roughness Parameters
    Garcia Jurado, D.
    Garofano, J. E.
    Contreras, J. P.
    Marcos, M.
    [J]. THIRD MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MESIC-09, 2009, 1181 : 418 - 426
  • [6] 2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores
    Zou, Chunjiang
    Li, Jing
    Wu, Yun
    Yatao, Yan
    Li, Jianchun
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 82 (08)
  • [7] 2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores
    Chunjiang Zou
    Jing Li
    Yun Wu
    Yan Yatao
    Jianchun Li
    [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2023, 82
  • [8] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [9] From 2D to 3D characterization of ceramic membranes
    Vicente, J.
    Wyart, Y.
    Moulin, P.
    [J]. EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 517 - 520
  • [10] Layering in zeolites: Microscopic characterization in 2D and 3D
    Arslan, Ilke
    Batenburg, Kees
    Gates, Bruce
    Dixon, David
    Katz, Alexander
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244