2D and 3D Roughness Characterization

被引:94
|
作者
Magsipoc, Earl [1 ]
Zhao, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Grasselli, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Roughness characterization; Rock joint roughness; Aperture; Joint shear strength; Fractal roughness; Synthetic roughness; PEAK SHEAR-STRENGTH; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; ROCK JOINTS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; NATURAL FRACTURE; COEFFICIENT JRC; FLUID-FLOW; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-019-01977-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The quantification of surface roughness for the purpose of linking its effect to mechanical and hydrodynamic behavior has taken many different forms. In this paper, we present a thorough review of commonly used 2D and 3D surface roughness characterization methods, categorized as statistical, fractal, and directional. Statistical methods are further subdivided into parametric and functional methods that yield a single value and function to evaluate roughness, respectively. These statistical roughness metrics are useful as their resultant outputs can be used in estimating shear and flow behavior in fractures. Fractal characterization methods treat rough surfaces and profiles as fractal objects to provide parameters that characterize roughness at different scales. The directional characterization method encompasses an approach more closely linked to shear strength and is more suitable for estimating the influence of fracture roughness on mechanical responses. Overall, roughness characterization methods provide an effective objective measure of surface texture that describe its influence on the mechanics of surfaces without requiring qualitative description.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1519
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 2D and 3D Characterization of Damage Mechanisms in A319 Alloy
    A. Dos Santos
    J. Hosdez
    N. Limodin
    A. El Bartali
    A. Tandjaoui
    J.-F. Witz
    C. Niclaeys
    P. Quaegebeur
    D. Najjar
    Experimental Mechanics, 2023, 63 : 377 - 382
  • [32] 2D and 3D Characterization of PtNi Nanowire Electrode Composition and Structure
    Shulda, Sarah
    Weker, Johanna Nelson
    Ngo, Chilan
    Alia, Shaun M.
    Mauger, Scott A.
    Neyerlin, K. C.
    Pivovar, Bryan S.
    Pylypenko, Svitlana
    ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS, 2019, 2 (01) : 525 - 534
  • [33] Characterization of KRas pathway inhibitors in 2D and 3D screening formats
    Schaich, Katharina
    Feger, Daniel
    Siedentopf, Oliver
    Ulrich, Sarah
    Ehlert, Jan Erik
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [34] Axisymmetric plasma plume characterization with 2D and 3D particle codes
    Dominguez-Vazquez, A.
    Cichocki, F.
    Merino, M.
    Fajardo, P.
    Ahedo, E.
    PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 27 (10):
  • [35] 2D and 3D Characterization of Damage Mechanisms in A319 Alloy
    Dos Santos, A.
    Hosdez, J.
    Limodin, N.
    El Bartali, A.
    Tandjaoui, A.
    Witz, J-F
    Niclaeys, C.
    Quaegebeur, P.
    Najjar, D.
    EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2023, 63 (02) : 377 - 382
  • [36] The Overview of 2D to 3D Conversion
    Deng, Qingqing
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Shaobin
    2013 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS INFORMATION AND EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION (ICEIEC), 2014, : 226 - 229
  • [37] 3D Experience on a 2D Display
    Srinath, Raghunandan
    Aishwarya, P.
    Suman, B.
    Ramgopichand, V. N.
    Surabhi, N.
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI), 2021,
  • [38] 2D to 3D: Raising the stakes
    CAE, Computer-Aided Engineering, 2000, 19 (04):
  • [39] 3D IMAGES WITH 2D FOOTPRINT
    Ferre Ferri, Enrique
    REVISTA SONDA-INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA EN ARTES Y LETRAS, 2020, (09): : 73 - 82
  • [40] Nanoparticle superlattices in 2D and 3D
    Schatz, George
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254