2D and 3D Roughness Characterization

被引:94
|
作者
Magsipoc, Earl [1 ]
Zhao, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Grasselli, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Roughness characterization; Rock joint roughness; Aperture; Joint shear strength; Fractal roughness; Synthetic roughness; PEAK SHEAR-STRENGTH; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; ROCK JOINTS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; NATURAL FRACTURE; COEFFICIENT JRC; FLUID-FLOW; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-019-01977-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The quantification of surface roughness for the purpose of linking its effect to mechanical and hydrodynamic behavior has taken many different forms. In this paper, we present a thorough review of commonly used 2D and 3D surface roughness characterization methods, categorized as statistical, fractal, and directional. Statistical methods are further subdivided into parametric and functional methods that yield a single value and function to evaluate roughness, respectively. These statistical roughness metrics are useful as their resultant outputs can be used in estimating shear and flow behavior in fractures. Fractal characterization methods treat rough surfaces and profiles as fractal objects to provide parameters that characterize roughness at different scales. The directional characterization method encompasses an approach more closely linked to shear strength and is more suitable for estimating the influence of fracture roughness on mechanical responses. Overall, roughness characterization methods provide an effective objective measure of surface texture that describe its influence on the mechanics of surfaces without requiring qualitative description.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1519
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3D to 2D perovskite conversion
    Allard, Charlotte
    NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS, 2023, 8 (12) : 781 - 781
  • [42] Rapid 2D to 3D conversion
    Harman, P
    Flack, J
    Fox, S
    Dowley, M
    STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS IX, 2002, 4660 : 78 - 86
  • [43] 2D/3D switchable displays
    Jacobs, Adrian
    Mather, Jonathan
    Winlow, Robert
    Montgomery, David
    Jones, Graham
    Willis, Morgan
    Tillin, Martin
    Hill, Lyndon
    Khazova, Marina
    Stevenson, Heather
    Bourhill, Grant
    Shapu Giho/Sharp Technical Journal, 2003, (85): : 15 - 18
  • [44] Image scanners: 2D and 3D
    Handley, R.
    Advanced Imaging, 2001, 16 (07) : 28 - 33
  • [45] TRIANGULATION IN 2D AND 3D SPACE
    YVINEC, M
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1989, 391 : 275 - 291
  • [46] TRIANGULATION IN 2D AND 3D SPACE
    YVINEC, M
    GEOMETRY AND ROBOTICS, 1989, 391 : 275 - 291
  • [47] 2D and 3D image processing
    2D- und 3D-Bildverarbeitung
    Materialpruefung/Materials Testing, 2001, 43 (05):
  • [48] 2D vision in a 3D System
    Flinders, M
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND COMPUTER VISION XX: ALGORITHMS, TECHNIQUES, AND ACTIVE VISION, 2001, 4572 : 422 - 426
  • [49] 2D AND 3D PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATIONS
    KORNEL, K
    COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS, 1990, 14 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [50] Comparing 2D and 3D Imaging
    Ballantyne, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (03) : 138 - 141