Modeling the Effect of Roughness on Ultrasonic Scattering in 2D and 3D

被引:7
|
作者
Cegla, Frederic [1 ]
Jarvis, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, NDE Grp, Dept Mech Engn, South Kensington SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Roughness Modeling; Distributed Point Source Method; SH Waves; 3D Modeling;
D O I
10.1063/1.4864874
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
With the advances of ultrasonic sensor technology, permanent installation of sensors and/or automation of scanning equipment the effect of human errors in NDE can be reduced and it is the unknown boundary conditions of the physics that determine the underlying scatter of the response of a sensor system. The authors have developed a fast and efficient acoustic model that predicts the scatter from rough boundaries and calculates the resultant ultrasonic signal. The predicted responses have been experimentally validated and show good agreement between theory and experiment. A statistical approach is needed to evaluate the response distribution for many different setups and simulation times in 3D can be prohibitive. Therefore a simplification approach that allows description of the 3D response by a 2D model is described for a particular application. This allows the simulation of full statistical distributions of defect populations in a few minutes.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 601
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Earl Magsipoc
    Qi Zhao
    Giovanni Grasselli
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1495 - 1519
  • [2] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Magsipoc, Earl
    Zhao, Qi
    Grasselli, Giovanni
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1495 - 1519
  • [3] Efficient Finite Element Modeling of Scattering for 2D and 3D Problems
    Wilcox, Paul D.
    Velichko, Alexander
    [J]. HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2010, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 7650
  • [4] 2D and 3D photoresist line roughness characterization
    Pret, Alessandro Vaglio
    Kunnen, Eddy
    Gronheid, Roel
    Pargon, Erwine
    Luere, Olivier
    Bianchi, Davide
    [J]. MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 110 : 100 - 107
  • [5] 2D/3D VIRTUAL FACE MODELING
    Chung, SoonKee
    Bazin, Jean-Charles
    Kweon, Inso
    [J]. 2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2011, : 1097 - 1100
  • [6] 2D AND 3D VECTOR FORWARD MODELING
    JOHNSON, OG
    CHENG, TY
    [J]. WORLD OIL, 1983, 196 (05) : 218 - &
  • [7] Comparing of 2D and 3D modeling of MSM
    Bulva, J
    Szendiuch, I
    [J]. 2005 Spanish Conference on Electron Devices, Proceedings, 2005, : 473 - 475
  • [8] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [9] Micromachined ultrasonic transducers and their use for 2D and 3D imaging
    Khuri-Yakub, BT
    Ergun, AS
    Huang, Y
    Cheng, CH
    Oralkan, O
    Johnson, J
    Yaralioglu, GG
    Karaman, M
    [J]. ACOUSTICAL IMAGING, VOL 27, 2004, 27 : 1 - 9
  • [10] Proposal of a Correlation Function between 2D and 3D Roughness Parameters
    Garcia Jurado, D.
    Garofano, J. E.
    Contreras, J. P.
    Marcos, M.
    [J]. THIRD MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MESIC-09, 2009, 1181 : 418 - 426