2D and 3D photoresist line roughness characterization

被引:1
|
作者
Pret, Alessandro Vaglio [1 ]
Kunnen, Eddy [1 ]
Gronheid, Roel [1 ]
Pargon, Erwine [2 ]
Luere, Olivier [2 ]
Bianchi, Davide [3 ]
机构
[1] IMEC, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] CNRS LTM UJF INP Grenoble, F-38054 Grenoble 09, France
[3] AC2T Res GmbH, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
关键词
Lithography; LER; LWR; CD-SEM; CD-AFM; LINEWIDTH ROUGHNESS; EDGE; RESIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.mee.2013.02.037
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Lithographic scaling is approaching 16 nm feature dimensions. Besides the manufacturing challenges, metrology is also suffering with feature scaling: Scanning microscopy is struggling to capture the roughness of the new photoresist platforms for ArF and extreme-UV lithography, thinner and more sensitive to electron bombardment. Moreover, standard figure of merit such as feature dimensions and line roughness should be integrated with fractal analysis and frequency evaluation, both needed to understand the root-causes of resist roughness. For this purpose, 3D sidewall information are likely to be required in order to choose the best process settings to reduce the roughness after exposure and during pattern transfer. In this paper, line width/edge roughness characterization is reported by means of power spectral density and fractal analysis. These results are compared with 3D atomic force microscopy and thickness measurements. A synthetic 3D surface reconstruction model is then extrapolated from the power spectral densities. The full method is tested on a plasma-based smoothing technique, where the patterned resist is exposed to plasma-UV light in order to reduce the roughness before the etch steps. Between 15% and 50% edge roughness reduction is obtained, at the cost of resist thickness loss and line shape deterioration. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Earl Magsipoc
    Qi Zhao
    Giovanni Grasselli
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1495 - 1519
  • [2] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Magsipoc, Earl
    Zhao, Qi
    Grasselli, Giovanni
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1495 - 1519
  • [3] Stochastic modeling of photoresist development in 2D and 3D
    Mack, Chris A.
    ADVANCES IN RESIST MATERIALS AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY XXVII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 7639
  • [4] Modeling the Effect of Roughness on Ultrasonic Scattering in 2D and 3D
    Cegla, Frederic
    Jarvis, Andrew
    40TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: INCORPORATING THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BARKHAUSEN NOISE AND MICROMAGNETIC TESTING, VOLS 33A & 33B, 2014, 1581 : 595 - 601
  • [5] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [6] Proposal of a Correlation Function between 2D and 3D Roughness Parameters
    Garcia Jurado, D.
    Garofano, J. E.
    Contreras, J. P.
    Marcos, M.
    THIRD MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MESIC-09, 2009, 1181 : 418 - 426
  • [7] 2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores
    Chunjiang Zou
    Jing Li
    Yun Wu
    Yan Yatao
    Jianchun Li
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2023, 82
  • [8] 2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores
    Zou, Chunjiang
    Li, Jing
    Wu, Yun
    Yatao, Yan
    Li, Jianchun
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 82 (08)
  • [9] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [10] From 2D to 3D characterization of ceramic membranes
    Vicente, J.
    Wyart, Y.
    Moulin, P.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 517 - 520