2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores

被引:0
|
作者
Chunjiang Zou
Jing Li
Yun Wu
Yan Yatao
Jianchun Li
机构
[1] Monash University,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] China University of Mining & Technology,State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering
[3] Southeast University,School of Civil Engineering
关键词
Rock core; Anisotropy; Roughness; Site investigation; Shear strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since rock joint surfaces are not universally exposed in engineering practice, these surfaces usually cannot be easily obtained or observed. However, it is more convenient to obtain a part of these joints by drilling rock cores through them, and the diameter of the normal rock cores (75 mm or 100 mm) is close to the length of typical profiles (100 mm) given by Barton (1973). This study investigates a part of a joint splitting a rock core and the roughness of the exposed round surface. Both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) methods are used to study the anisotropy of roughness at different shear conditions as well as the predicted shear strength, and a comparison between 2D and 3D methods is explored. Results confirm that shear directions affect both the 2D and 3D roughness parameters and hence shear strength with a similar variation trend according to rose diagrams. However, the rose diagram obtained by the 2D method shows central symmetry due to the central symmetry of the roughness parameter, while the diagram given by the 3D method is not. Moreover, the shear strength predicted by the 3D method is normally higher than that by the 2D JRC method at any shear direction. In addition, the weighing factor of surface roughness in evaluating the shear strength is also discussed. According to the theoretical model analysis, the study shows a potential application of rock cores in evaluating roughness, hence the shear strength of an engineering-scale joint.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2D and 3D evaluation of joint roughness exposed by rock cores
    Zou, Chunjiang
    Li, Jing
    Wu, Yun
    Yatao, Yan
    Li, Jianchun
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 82 (08)
  • [2] ROCK JOINT ROUGHNESS QUANTIFICATION USING 2D AND 3D FRACTAL METHODS
    Ankah, Mawuko Luke Yaw
    Kulatilake, Pinnaduwa H. S. W.
    Sunkpal, Desmond Talamwin
    Zhao, Xiaokang
    [J]. FRACTALS-COMPLEX GEOMETRY PATTERNS AND SCALING IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2022, 30 (07)
  • [3] 2D and 3D Roughness Coefficient of Marble Joint Surface
    Wang, Chenlin
    Guo, Baohua
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (12): : 4359 - 4368
  • [4] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Earl Magsipoc
    Qi Zhao
    Giovanni Grasselli
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53 : 1495 - 1519
  • [5] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Magsipoc, Earl
    Zhao, Qi
    Grasselli, Giovanni
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1495 - 1519
  • [6] Measurement of rock joint roughness by 3D scanner
    Hong, Eun-Soo
    Lee, In-Mo
    Lee, Jong-Sub
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2006, 29 (06): : 482 - 489
  • [7] Close-Range Photogrammetry for 3D Rock Joint Roughness Evaluation
    Paixao, Andre
    Muralha, Jose
    Resende, Ricardo
    Fortunato, Eduardo
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2022, 55 (06) : 3213 - 3233
  • [8] Close-Range Photogrammetry for 3D Rock Joint Roughness Evaluation
    André Paixão
    José Muralha
    Ricardo Resende
    Eduardo Fortunato
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55 : 3213 - 3233
  • [9] SURFACE TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF A JOINT SAMPLE BY 2D AND 3D SURFACE ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS
    Manas, K.
    Hnidka, J.
    Triska, V
    [J]. ENGINEERING MECHANICS 2019, 2019, 25 : 247 - 250
  • [10] Influence of the Choice of Reference Planes on the Determination of 2D and 3D Joint Roughness Parameters
    Wong, Louis Ngai Yuen
    Meng, Fanzhen
    Zhou, Hui
    Yu, Jin
    Cheng, Guangtan
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2021, 54 (08) : 4393 - 4406