Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

被引:54
|
作者
Wilson, Matthew J. A. [1 ]
MacArthur, Christine [2 ]
Hewitt, Catherine A. [2 ]
Handley, Kelly [2 ]
Gao, Fang [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [2 ]
Daniels, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Res Labs, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
来源
LANCET | 2018年 / 392卷 / 10148期
关键词
CHILDBIRTH; MEPERIDINE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1: 1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 mu g bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66; p<0.0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study. Interpretation Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl
    Tveit, Tor O.
    Seiler, Stephen
    Halvorsen, Arthur
    Rosland, Jan H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 129 - 136
  • [32] A randomized trial of patient-controlled epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia during labor
    Sharma, SK
    Leveno, KJ
    Messick, G
    Alexander, JM
    Sidawi, JE
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, : U8 - U8
  • [33] A comparison of intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia: a two-centre randomised blinded controlled trial
    Wee, M. Y. K.
    Tuckey, J. P.
    Thomas, P. W.
    Burnard, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [34] PATIENT-CONTROLLED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ANALGESIA FOR POSTSURGICAL PAIN RELIEF IN ADOLESCENTS
    WALSON, PD
    GRAVES, PS
    MORTENSEN, ME
    KERN, RA
    TORCH, MA
    DEVELOPMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1992, 19 (01): : 32 - 39
  • [35] The effect of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus epidural in labour: maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Bhagvandas, J.
    Foon, R.
    Fong, K.
    Nair, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 : 9 - 9
  • [36] Comparison of pain relief between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgeries
    Shan Lu
    Si-Chao Ma
    Yun-Yun Wang
    Zhi-Hua Zhu
    Hong-Wu Fan
    Guo-Qing Zhao
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2015, 135 : 1247 - 1255
  • [37] Comparison of pain relief between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgeries
    Lu, Shan
    Ma, Si-Chao
    Wang, Yun-Yun
    Zhu, Zhi-Hua
    Fan, Hong-Wu
    Zhao, Guo-Qing
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (09) : 1247 - 1255
  • [38] Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia A randomised controlled trial
    Wehrfritz, Andreas
    Ihmsen, Harald
    Fuchte, Tobias
    Kim, Michael
    Kremer, Sven
    Weiss, Alexander
    Schuettler, Juergen
    Jeleazcov, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (12) : 1168 - 1175
  • [39] Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Min
    Li, Dewei
    Chen, Rufu
    Huang, Xiaobing
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Yahui
    Liu, Jianhua
    Cheng, Wei
    Chen, Xuemin
    Zhao, Wenxing
    Li, Jingdong
    Tan, Zhijian
    Huang, Heguang
    Li, Deyu
    Zhu, Feng
    Qin, Tingting
    Ma, Jingdong
    Yu, Guangsheng
    Zhou, Baoyong
    Zheng, Shangyou
    Tang, Yichen
    Han, Wei
    Meng, Lingyu
    Ke, Jianji
    Feng, Feng
    Chen, Botao
    Yin, Xinmin
    Chen, Weibo
    Ma, Hongqin
    Xu, Jian
    Liu, Yifeng
    Lin, Ronggui
    Dong, Yadong
    Yu, Yahong
    Liu, Jun
    Zhang, Hang
    Qin, Renyi
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 6 (06): : 438 - 447
  • [40] Epidural versus intravenous sufentanil by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Menigaux, C
    Dupont, X
    Alfonsi, P
    Chauvin, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (3A) : A762 - A762