Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

被引:54
|
作者
Wilson, Matthew J. A. [1 ]
MacArthur, Christine [2 ]
Hewitt, Catherine A. [2 ]
Handley, Kelly [2 ]
Gao, Fang [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [2 ]
Daniels, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Res Labs, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
来源
LANCET | 2018年 / 392卷 / 10148期
关键词
CHILDBIRTH; MEPERIDINE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1: 1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 mu g bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66; p<0.0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study. Interpretation Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Qualitative exploration of women's experiences of intramuscular pethidine or remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour pain
    Moran, Victoria Hall
    Thomson, Gillian
    Cook, Julie
    Storey, Hannah
    Beeson, Leanne
    MacArthur, Christine
    Wilson, Matthew
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [12] Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial
    Freeman, Liv M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W.
    Franssen, Maureen T.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N.
    Hajenius, Petra J.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Woiski, Mallory D.
    Porath, Martina
    van den Berg, Hans J.
    van Beek, Erik
    Borchert, Odette W. H. M.
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    Sikkema, J. Marko
    Kuipers, A. H. M.
    Logtenberg, Sabine L. M.
    van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Lopriore, Enrico
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    le Cessie, Saskia
    van Lith, Jan M.
    Struys, Michel M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Dahan, Albert
    Middeldorp, Johanna M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [13] Comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour - Reply
    Volikas, I
    Male, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2002, 11 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [15] Should remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia be a routine choice for pain relief in labour?
    Bykar, Hannah
    Mandour, Yasser
    Bampoe, Sam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 83 (09)
  • [16] An economic analysis of patient controlled remifentanil and epidural analgesia as pain relief in labour (RAVEL trial); a randomised controlled trial
    Freeman, Liv
    Middeldorp, Johanna
    van den Akker, Eline
    Oudijk, Martijn
    Bax, Caroline
    van Huizen, Marloes
    Radder, Celine
    Fong, Bianca
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    Dahan, Albert
    Struys, Michel
    Mol, Ben Willem
    van Lith, Jan
    van den Akker-van Marle, Elske
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [17] Remifentanil versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled labour analgesia: an observational study
    Marwah, Radhika
    Hassan, Samah
    Carvalho, Jose C. A.
    Balki, Mrinalini
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2012, 59 (03): : 246 - 254
  • [18] Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Liv M Freeman
    Kitty WM Bloemenkamp
    Maureen TM Franssen
    Dimitri NM Papatsonis
    Petra J Hajenius
    Marloes E van Huizen
    Henk A Bremer
    Eline SA van den Akker
    Mallory D Woiski
    Martina M Porath
    Erik van Beek
    Nico Schuitemaker
    Paulien CM van der Salm
    Bianca F Fong
    Celine Radder
    Caroline J Bax
    Marko Sikkema
    M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
    Jan MM van Lith
    Enrico Lopriore
    Renske J Uildriks
    Michel MRF Struys
    Ben Willem J Mol
    Albert Dahan
    Johanna M Middeldorp
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12
  • [19] Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Freeman, Liv M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    Franssen, Maureen T. M.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
    Hajenius, Petra J.
    van Huizen, Marloes E.
    Bremer, Henk A.
    van den Akker, Eline S. A.
    Woiski, Mallory D.
    Porath, Martina M.
    van Beek, Erik
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
    Fong, Bianca F.
    Radder, Celine
    Bax, Caroline J.
    Sikkema, Marko
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    van Lith, Jan M. M.
    Lopriore, Enrico
    Uildriks, Renske J.
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Dahan, Albert
    Middeldorp, Johanna M.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2012, 12
  • [20] Differences in maternal temperature during labour with remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia or epidural analgesia: a randomised controlled trial
    Douma, M. R.
    Stienstra, R.
    Middeldorp, J. M.
    Arbous, M. S.
    Dahan, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 24 (04) : 313 - 322