Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

被引:54
|
作者
Wilson, Matthew J. A. [1 ]
MacArthur, Christine [2 ]
Hewitt, Catherine A. [2 ]
Handley, Kelly [2 ]
Gao, Fang [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [2 ]
Daniels, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Res Labs, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
来源
LANCET | 2018年 / 392卷 / 10148期
关键词
CHILDBIRTH; MEPERIDINE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1: 1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 mu g bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66; p<0.0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study. Interpretation Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia: a two-centre randomised blinded controlled trial Reply
    Wee, M. Y. K.
    Tuckey, J. P.
    Thomas, P. W.
    Burnard, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (12) : 1574 - 1575
  • [42] Patient-Controlled Remifentanil Analgesia as Alternative for Pethidine with Midazolam During Oocyte Retrieval in IVF/ICSI Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lier, Marit C.
    Douwenga, Wieteke M.
    Yilmaz, Fatos
    Schats, Roel
    Hompes, Peter G.
    Boer, Christa
    Mijatovic, Velja
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2015, 15 (05) : 487 - 495
  • [43] Patient-controlled analgesia in ongoing pain in children. An open-label prospective study of a standardized technique
    Duval, M
    Legrand, F
    Faye, A
    Escot, A
    Vernois, S
    Rohrlich, P
    Wood, C
    Bockenmeyer, J
    Vilmer, E
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2000, 7 (05): : 474 - 480
  • [44] A double blinded randomised placebo-controlled study of intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in the first stage of labour
    Tsui, MHY
    Kee, WDN
    Ng, FF
    Lau, TK
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (07) : 648 - 655
  • [45] Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief
    Toussaint, S
    Maidl, J
    Schwagmeier, R
    Striebel, HW
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (04): : 299 - 302
  • [46] Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Open Liver Surgery A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
    Hausken, John
    Fretland, Asmund Avdem
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Andersen, Marit Helen
    Dagenborg, Vegar Johansen
    Bjornelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
    Kristiansen, Ronny
    Roysland, Kjetil
    Kvarstein, Gunnvald
    Tonnessen, Tor Inge
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [47] Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief
    Susanne Toussaint
    Julia Maidl
    Rolf Schwagmeier
    Hans Walter Striebel
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2000, 47 : 299 - 302
  • [48] Randomized Controlled Trial of Epidural versus Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Kikuchi, Satoru
    Kuroda, Shinji
    Nishizaki, Masahiko
    Matsusaki, Takashi
    Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
    Kuwada, Kazuya
    Kagawa, Shunsuke
    Morimatsu, Hiroshi
    Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2018, 72 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [49] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829): : 1887 - 1892
  • [50] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Khan, Omar
    Nizar, Shiyam
    Vasilikostas, Georgios
    Wan, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2012, 4 (05) : 465 - 466