Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

被引:54
|
作者
Wilson, Matthew J. A. [1 ]
MacArthur, Christine [2 ]
Hewitt, Catherine A. [2 ]
Handley, Kelly [2 ]
Gao, Fang [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [2 ]
Daniels, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Res Labs, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
来源
LANCET | 2018年 / 392卷 / 10148期
关键词
CHILDBIRTH; MEPERIDINE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1: 1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 mu g bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66; p<0.0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study. Interpretation Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Remifentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Labor Pain Relief: Is It Really an Option to Consider?
    Van de Velde, M.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (04): : 1029 - 1031
  • [22] Intramuscular opioids for maternal pain relief in labour: a randomised controlled trial comparing pethidine with diamorphine
    Fairlie, FM
    Marshall, L
    Walker, JJ
    Elbourne, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (11): : 1181 - 1187
  • [24] A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour
    Douma, M. R.
    Middeldorp, J. M.
    Verwey, R. A.
    Dahan, A.
    Stienstrad, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 20 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [25] Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour
    Weibel, Stephanie
    Jelting, Yvonne
    Afshari, Arash
    Pace, Nathan Leon
    Eberhart, Leopold H. J.
    Jokinen, Johanna
    Artmann, Thorsten
    Kranke, Peter
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (04):
  • [26] Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of maternal and neonatal effects of patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous infusion
    Shen, M. K.
    Wu, Z. F.
    Zhu, A. B.
    He, L. L.
    Shen, X. F.
    Yang, J. J.
    Feng, S. W.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (03) : 236 - 244
  • [27] EPIDURAL PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - AN ALTERNATIVE TO INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY
    PARKER, RK
    WHITE, PF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 75 (02): : 245 - 251
  • [28] A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Respiratory Effects of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women
    Stocki, Daniel
    Matot, Idit
    Einav, Sharon
    Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
    Ginosar, Yehuda
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (03): : 589 - 597
  • [29] A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor
    Halpern, SH
    Muir, H
    Breen, TW
    Campbell, DC
    Barrett, J
    Liston, R
    Blanchard, JW
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (05): : 1532 - 1538
  • [30] Perioperative patient-controlled regional analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients with critical limb ischaemia: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Chen, Si
    Xu, Zhonghuang
    Liu, Hongju
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Zhang, Jiao
    Chen, Yuexin
    Zheng, Yuehong
    Huang, Yuguang
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):