Direct DC Voltages Comparison between two Programmable Josephson Voltage Standards at SCL

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, S. [1 ]
Cular, S. [2 ,3 ]
Rufenacht, A. [2 ,3 ]
Burroughs, C. J. [2 ,3 ]
Dresselhaus, P. D. [2 ,3 ]
Benz, S. P. [2 ,3 ]
Ng, M. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stand & Calibrat Lab, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
关键词
Programmable Josephson voltage standard; quantum voltage measurement; measurement uncertainty; Josephson voltage comparison;
D O I
10.1109/cpem49742.2020.9191745
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Standards and Calibration Laboratory (SCL) setup in 2018 a liquid helium based programmable Josephson voltage standard (PJVS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The system was validated by direct comparison with a NIST transportable PJVS system at 1.018 V, 4 V, 6 V, 8 V and 10 V. The difference between the systems was within 0.5 nV, with an expanded uncertainty of less than 2.2 nV (k = 2). In this paper, the setup and the results of the direct comparison method are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A direct DC 10 V comparison between the NIMJ and the BIPM Programmable Josephson Voltage Standards
    Solve, Stephane
    Chayramy, Regis
    Maruyama, Michitaka
    Urano, Chiharu
    Kaneko, Nobu-hisa
    2016 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2016), 2016,
  • [2] Automated direct comparison of two cryocooled 10 volt programmable Josephson voltage standards
    Rufenacht, Alain
    Tang, Yi-hua
    Solve, Stephane
    Fox, Anna E.
    Dresselhaus, Paul D.
    Burroughs, Charles J.
    Schwall, Robert E.
    Chayramy, Regis
    Benz, Samuel P.
    METROLOGIA, 2018, 55 (04) : 585 - 596
  • [3] 10 Volt Automated Direct Comparison of Two Cryocooled Programmable Josephson Voltage Standards
    Rufenacht, Alain
    Tang, Yi-hua
    Fox, Anna E.
    Dresselhaus, Paul D.
    Burroughs, Charles J.
    Schwall, Robert E.
    Benz, Samuel P.
    2016 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2016), 2016,
  • [4] Direct Comparison of DC Josephson Voltage Standard and Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard of TUBITAK UME
    Turhan, Saliha
    Kanatoglu, Naylan
    Orhan, Recep
    2018 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2018), 2018,
  • [5] Direct DC 10 V comparison between two programmable Josephson voltage standards made of niobium nitride (NbN)-based and niobium (Nb)-based Josephson junctions
    Solve, S.
    Chayramy, R.
    Maruyama, M.
    Urano, C.
    Kaneko, N-H
    Rufenacht, A.
    METROLOGIA, 2018, 55 (02) : 302 - 313
  • [6] Application of a 10 V Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard in Direct Comparison With Conventional Josephson Voltage Standards
    Tang, Yi-Hua
    Wachter, James
    Ruefenacht, Alain
    FitzPatrick, Gerald J.
    Benz, Samuel P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2015, 64 (12) : 3458 - 3466
  • [7] A direct comparison of Josephson Array Voltage Standards
    Liu, L. X.
    Chua, S. W.
    Lee, J.
    Zhou, Y.
    Hamilton, C. A.
    2008 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS DIGEST, 2008, : 368 - +
  • [8] COMPARISON OF NIM AND BIRMM PROGRAMMABLE JOSEPHSON VOLTAGE STANDARDS.
    Gao, Yuan
    Li, Honghui
    Wang, Zengmin
    Kang, Yan
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhu, Zhu
    2010 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS CPEM, 2010, : 52 - +
  • [9] DC Comparison of a Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard and a Josephson Arbitrary Waveform Synthesizer
    Rufenacht, Alain
    Flowers-Jacobs, Nathan E.
    Fox, Anna E.
    Waltman, Steven B.
    Schwall, Robert E.
    Burroughs, Charles J.
    Dresselhaus, Paul D.
    Benz, Samuel P.
    2018 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2018), 2018,
  • [10] Direct Comparison of Josephson Voltage Standards at 10 V Between BIPM and CENAM
    Aviles, David
    Navarrete, Enrique
    Hernandez, Dionisio
    Solve, Stephane
    Chayramy, Regis
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2013, 62 (06) : 1640 - 1645