Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

被引:15
|
作者
van der Waal, Danille [1 ]
Emaus, Marleen J. [2 ]
Bakker, Marije F. [2 ]
den Heeten, Gerard J. [3 ,4 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [5 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [3 ,6 ]
Veldhuis, Wouter B. [6 ]
Verbeek, Andre L. M. [1 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Evidence, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Digital mammography; Breast cancer screening; Mammographic density; Socio-economic status; Urbanisation; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Differences in breast density between populations may explain part of the variation in regional breast cancer screening performance. This study aimed to determine whether regional differences in breast density distribution are present in the Dutch screening population. As part of the DENSE trial, mammographic density was measured using a fully-automated volumetric method. The regions in our study were based on the geographic coverage of 14 reading units representing a large part of the Netherlands. General linear models were used. Four hundred eighty-five thousand and twenty-one screening participants with a median age of 60 years were included (2013-2014). The proportion of women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts ranged from 32.5 % to 45.7 % between regions. Mean percent dense volume varied between 6.51 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 6.46-6.55) and 7.68 % (95 % CI: 7.66-7.71). Age differences could not explain the variation. Socio-economic status (SES) was positively associated with volumetric density in all analyses (low SES: 6.95 % vs. high SES: 7.63 %; p (trend) < 0.0001), whereas a potential association between urbanisation and breast density only became apparent after SES adjustment. There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance. aEuro cent Mammographic density may affect regional breast cancer screening performance. aEuro cent Volumetric breast density varies across screening areas. aEuro cent SES is positively associated with breast density. aEuro cent Implications of volumetric breast density differences need to be studied further.
引用
收藏
页码:3328 / 3337
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Volumetric breast density measurement for personalized screening: accuracy, reproducibility, consistency, and agreement with visual assessment
    Fieselmann, Andreas
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Fornvik, Hannie
    Lang, Kristina
    Sartor, Hanna
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Kappler, Steffen
    Ritschl, Ludwig
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [22] Volumetric breast density and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode: a cohort study
    Donella Puliti
    Marco Zappa
    Paolo Giorgi Rossi
    Elena Pierpaoli
    Gianfranco Manneschi
    Daniela Ambrogetti
    Leonardo Ventura
    Paola Mantellini
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 20
  • [23] International Variation in Breast Surgeons' Attitudes Towards Prophylactic Surgeries and Intensive Screening-Comparison Between France, Germany, The Netherlands and The UK
    Den Heijer, Mariska
    van Asperen, Christi
    Harris, Hilary
    Nippert, Irma
    Schmidtke, Joerg
    Bouhnik, Anne-Deborah
    Julian-Reynier, Claire
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Tibben, Aad
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 202 - 202
  • [24] Large variation between hospitals in immediate breast reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands
    van Bommel, A. C. M.
    Mureau, M. A. M.
    Schreuder, K.
    van Dalen, T.
    Peeters, M. T. F. D. Vrancken
    Schrieks, M.
    Maduro, J. H.
    Siesling, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (02): : 215 - 221
  • [25] Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer
    Kathleen R. Brandt
    Christopher G. Scott
    Diana L. Miglioretti
    Matthew R. Jensen
    Amir P. Mahmoudzadeh
    Carrie Hruska
    Lin Ma
    Fang Fang Wu
    Steven R. Cummings
    Aaron D. Norman
    Natalie J. Engmann
    John A. Shepherd
    Stacey J. Winham
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Celine M. Vachon
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 21
  • [26] Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Mahmoudzadeh, Amir P.
    Hruska, Carrie
    Ma, Lin
    Wu, Fang Fang
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Norman, Aaron D.
    Engmann, Natalie J.
    Shepherd, John A.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Vachon, Celine M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [27] Breast density estimation: Correlation of mammographic density and MR volumetric density
    Chan, HP
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Roubidoux, MA
    Helvie, MA
    Paquerault, S
    Sahiner, B
    Wei, J
    Zhou, C
    Chenevert, T
    Goodsitt, MM
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 281 - 284
  • [28] Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation using volumetric breast density software
    Koshi, Suzanne
    Singla, Veenu
    Singh, Tulika
    Prabhakar, Nidhi
    Bal, Amanjit
    Singh, Gurpreet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (06) : 1258 - 1264
  • [29] Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement
    Ko, Su Yeon
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Moon, Hee Jung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [30] Geographic variation in breast cancer care in Switzerland
    Ess, S.
    Savidan, A.
    Frick, H.
    Rageth, Ch.
    Vlastos, G.
    Luetolf, U.
    Thuerlimann, B.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (02) : 116 - 121