Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

被引:15
|
作者
van der Waal, Danille [1 ]
Emaus, Marleen J. [2 ]
Bakker, Marije F. [2 ]
den Heeten, Gerard J. [3 ,4 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [5 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [3 ,6 ]
Veldhuis, Wouter B. [6 ]
Verbeek, Andre L. M. [1 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Evidence, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Digital mammography; Breast cancer screening; Mammographic density; Socio-economic status; Urbanisation; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Differences in breast density between populations may explain part of the variation in regional breast cancer screening performance. This study aimed to determine whether regional differences in breast density distribution are present in the Dutch screening population. As part of the DENSE trial, mammographic density was measured using a fully-automated volumetric method. The regions in our study were based on the geographic coverage of 14 reading units representing a large part of the Netherlands. General linear models were used. Four hundred eighty-five thousand and twenty-one screening participants with a median age of 60 years were included (2013-2014). The proportion of women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts ranged from 32.5 % to 45.7 % between regions. Mean percent dense volume varied between 6.51 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 6.46-6.55) and 7.68 % (95 % CI: 7.66-7.71). Age differences could not explain the variation. Socio-economic status (SES) was positively associated with volumetric density in all analyses (low SES: 6.95 % vs. high SES: 7.63 %; p (trend) < 0.0001), whereas a potential association between urbanisation and breast density only became apparent after SES adjustment. There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance. aEuro cent Mammographic density may affect regional breast cancer screening performance. aEuro cent Volumetric breast density varies across screening areas. aEuro cent SES is positively associated with breast density. aEuro cent Implications of volumetric breast density differences need to be studied further.
引用
收藏
页码:3328 / 3337
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement
    Hatef Darabi
    Kamila Czene
    Wanting Zhao
    Jianjun Liu
    Per Hall
    Keith Humphreys
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [42] Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement
    Darabi, Hatef
    Czene, Kamila
    Zhao, Wanting
    Liu, Jianjun
    Hall, Per
    Humphreys, Keith
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (01):
  • [43] Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening
    L E M Duijm
    J H Groenewoud
    F H Jansen
    J Fracheboud
    M van Beek
    H J de Koning
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 1795 - 1799
  • [44] Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening
    Duijm, LEM
    Groenewoud, JH
    Jansen, FH
    Fracheboud, J
    van Beek, M
    de Koning, HJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (10) : 1795 - 1799
  • [45] Quantification of mammographic masking risk with volumetric breast density maps: How to select women for supplemental screening
    Holland, Katharina
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9785
  • [46] The contrast between geographic and non-geographic variation.
    Jordan, K
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WISSENSCHAFTLICHE ZOOLOGIE, 1905, 83 : 150 - 210
  • [47] Variation in Receipt of Radiation Therapy After Breast-conserving Surgery Assessing the Impact of Physicians and Geographic Regions
    Feinstein, Aaron J.
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Long, Jessica B.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Roberts, Kenneth B.
    Yu, James B.
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (04) : 330 - 338
  • [48] The Perception and the Status of the Peripheral Regions in the Netherlands and Romania. A Comparative Geographic Study
    Tarus , Raisa
    Surd, Vasile
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SETTLEMENTS AND SPATIAL PLANNING, 2015, : 181 - 190
  • [49] Volumetric Mammographic Density, Age-Related Decline, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Hjerkind, Kirsti Vik
    Ellingjord-Dale, Merete
    Johansson, Anna L. V.
    Aase, Hildegunn Siv
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Fagerheim, Siri
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Ursin, Giske
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2018, 27 (09) : 1065 - 1074
  • [50] Artificial-intelligence-driven volumetric breast density estimation with digital breast tomosynthesis in a racially diverse screening cohort.
    Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.
    Mankowski, Walter
    Pati, Sarthak
    Bakas, Spyridon
    Brooks, Ari D.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Kontos, Despina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)