Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

被引:15
|
作者
van der Waal, Danille [1 ]
Emaus, Marleen J. [2 ]
Bakker, Marije F. [2 ]
den Heeten, Gerard J. [3 ,4 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [5 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [3 ,6 ]
Veldhuis, Wouter B. [6 ]
Verbeek, Andre L. M. [1 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Evidence, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Digital mammography; Breast cancer screening; Mammographic density; Socio-economic status; Urbanisation; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Differences in breast density between populations may explain part of the variation in regional breast cancer screening performance. This study aimed to determine whether regional differences in breast density distribution are present in the Dutch screening population. As part of the DENSE trial, mammographic density was measured using a fully-automated volumetric method. The regions in our study were based on the geographic coverage of 14 reading units representing a large part of the Netherlands. General linear models were used. Four hundred eighty-five thousand and twenty-one screening participants with a median age of 60 years were included (2013-2014). The proportion of women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts ranged from 32.5 % to 45.7 % between regions. Mean percent dense volume varied between 6.51 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 6.46-6.55) and 7.68 % (95 % CI: 7.66-7.71). Age differences could not explain the variation. Socio-economic status (SES) was positively associated with volumetric density in all analyses (low SES: 6.95 % vs. high SES: 7.63 %; p (trend) < 0.0001), whereas a potential association between urbanisation and breast density only became apparent after SES adjustment. There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance. aEuro cent Mammographic density may affect regional breast cancer screening performance. aEuro cent Volumetric breast density varies across screening areas. aEuro cent SES is positively associated with breast density. aEuro cent Implications of volumetric breast density differences need to be studied further.
引用
收藏
页码:3328 / 3337
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates
    Polednak, AP
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (02) : 298 - 301
  • [32] Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project
    Gemici, Aysegul Akdogan
    Aribal, Erkin
    Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer
    Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan
    Ozcinar, Beyza
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Ozmen, Vahit
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2020, 16 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [33] The association between volumetric breast density and breast cancer subtypes among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
    Balema, Wintana A.
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    Weaver, Olena
    Hess, Kenneth R.
    Brewster, Abenaa M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [34] Estimation of volumetric breast density for breast cancer risk prediction
    Pawluczyk, O
    Yaffe, MJ
    Boyd, NF
    Jong, RA
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 3977 : 212 - 219
  • [35] Volumetric breast density, breast cancer subtypes and race.
    Shivalingappa, Hitesh
    Muzaffar, Mahvish
    Verbanac, Kathryn
    Vohra, Nasreen A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [36] Volumetric breast density improves breast cancer risk prediction
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Stukenborg, George J.
    Cohn, Wendy F.
    Repich, Kathy L.
    Alonzo, Olivier
    Novicof, Wendy M.
    Yaffe, Martin D.
    Knaus, William A.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [37] Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images
    Wei, J
    Chan, HP
    Helvie, MA
    Roubidoux, MA
    Sahiner, B
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Zhou, CA
    Paquerault, S
    Chenevert, T
    Goodsitt, MM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (04) : 933 - 942
  • [38] PB.25: Relationship between volumetric breast density, age and hormonal factors
    PF Johnson
    JC Sergeant
    M Bydder
    A Maxwell
    S Whiteside
    P Stavrinos
    M Wilson
    DG Evans
    A Howell
    SM Astley
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [39] Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting
    van der Waal, Danielle
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Schuur, Klaas H.
    Timmers, Johanna M. H.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [40] Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme
    Verbeek, ALM
    Broeders, MJM
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (08) : 1203 - 1205