Breast density estimation: Correlation of mammographic density and MR volumetric density

被引:0
|
作者
Chan, HP [1 ]
Hadjiiski, LM [1 ]
Roubidoux, MA [1 ]
Helvie, MA [1 ]
Paquerault, S [1 ]
Sahiner, B [1 ]
Wei, J [1 ]
Zhou, C [1 ]
Chenevert, T [1 ]
Goodsitt, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk. Mammographic breast density may therefore be used as a surrogate marker for monitoring the response to treatment in studies of breast cancer prevention or intervention methods. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of using mammograms for estimating breast density by analyzing the correlation between the percent mammographic dense area and the percent glandular tissue volume as estimated from MR images. A data set of 37 patients who had corresponding MR images and mammograms was collected. The glandular tissue regions in the MR slices were segmented by a semi-automatic method and the percent glandular tissue volume calculated. Mammographic breast density was estimated by an automated image analysis program. It was found that the correlation between the percent dense area of the CC and MLO views and the percent volumetric fibroglandular tissue on MR images was 0.93 and 0.91, respectively, with a mean bias of 4.4%. The high correlation indicates the usefulness of mammographic density as a surrogate for breast density estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 284
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement
    Ko, Su Yeon
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Moon, Hee Jung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [2] Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images
    Wei, J
    Chan, HP
    Helvie, MA
    Roubidoux, MA
    Sahiner, B
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Zhou, CA
    Paquerault, S
    Chenevert, T
    Goodsitt, MM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (04) : 933 - 942
  • [3] Dependence of Radiation Dose on Area and Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Estimation
    Jing, H.
    Keller, B.
    Choi, J. Y.
    Crescenzi, R.
    Conant, E.
    Maidment, A.
    Kontos, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [4] Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation using volumetric breast density software
    Koshi, Suzanne
    Singla, Veenu
    Singh, Tulika
    Prabhakar, Nidhi
    Bal, Amanjit
    Singh, Gurpreet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (06) : 1258 - 1264
  • [5] Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Johnston, Lisa
    Highnam, Ralph
    Arieno, Andrea
    Morgan, Renee
    Chan, Ariane
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 222 - 227
  • [6] Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI
    Wang, Jeff
    Azziz, Ania
    Fan, Bo
    Malkov, Serghei
    Klifa, Catherine
    Newitt, David
    Yitta, Silaja
    Hylton, Nola
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Shepherd, John A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [7] An alternative approach to measuring volumetric mammographic breast density
    Tromans, Christopher
    Brady, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 26 - 33
  • [8] Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts
    Rahbar, Kareem
    Gubern-Merida, Albert
    Patrie, James T.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 1561 - 1569
  • [9] Improving Mammographic Density Estimation in the Breast Periphery
    Chen, Xin
    Moschidis, Emmanouil
    Taylor, Chris
    Astley, Susan
    [J]. BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016, 2016, 9699 : 469 - 477
  • [10] Mammographic breast density
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (18): : 1885 - 1885